Hyland Park vs Valla Beach
Hyland Park is the younger of the two, with a median age of 49 against 55 in Valla Beach. In both, most households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and about half of households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Valla Beach: a median of $825,000, against $752,000 in Hyland Park, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Valla Beach tends to suit older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Valla Beach
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (6 vs 0)
- carries lower crime risk (36/100 vs 53/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Hyland Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($350/wk vs $400/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Valla Beach
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (38/100 vs 13/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Valla Beach
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (38/100 vs 13/100)
- carries lower crime risk (36/100 vs 53/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (34% vs 24%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Valla Beach
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (10.8% vs 2.6%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Hyland Park and Valla Beach drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Valla Beach has more residents (1,455 vs 440); Valla Beach rents higher ($400/wk vs $350/wk).
| Hyland Park | Valla Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 440 | 1,455 +231% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +2.6% | +10.8% |
| Median age | 49 | 55 |
| Median household income | $51,428/yr | $56,368/yr +10% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $350/wk | $400/wk +14% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.4%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (6.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Hyland Park | Valla Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $752,500 | $825,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $570,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 44 days from 9 sales |
Zoning mix
Valla Beach has more land zoned for conservation (52% vs 38%).
| Hyland Park | Valla Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | 38% | 52% |
| Residential | 46% | 28% |
| Parks and recreation | 15% | 18% |
| Rural and farming | 1% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Hyland Park | Valla Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 109 across Nambucca Valley same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -64% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Hyland Park | Valla Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.1% $560/wk on $936K | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Hyland Park | Valla Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 29% of NSW | Higher than 45% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 12% of NSW | Higher than 16% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 62% of NSW | Higher than 78% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 36% of NSW | Higher than 28% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 30% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 87% of NSW | Higher than 78% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 26% of NSW | — |
Liveability
Valla Beach is more walkable (38 vs 13).
| Hyland Park | Valla Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | C |
| Score | — | 38/100 |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 2/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 |
Risk profile
Valla Beach carries more bushfire risk (54 vs 0); Hyland Park carries more crime risk (53 vs 36).
| Hyland Park | Valla Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Moderate 54/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 53/100 | Low 36/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 | High 95/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Hyland Park | Valla Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Hyland Park | Valla Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 6 |
| Childcare | 0 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Beaches | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
| Hyland Park | Valla Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 13/100 | 38/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 488.2 km | 488.9 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 320 min | 319 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 2448 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 53 postcode 2448 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (75.8%).
Setting
| Hyland Park | Valla Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 9 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 16 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 1.1 km 1.1 km to a named beach | 476 m 1.1 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Hyland Park | Valla Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 77/100 | 71/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Fibre to the node |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 56% 240 premises | 47% 888 premises |
Council rates
| Hyland Park | Valla Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,175/yr same for both | |
| Council | Nambucca Valley same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Hyland Park | Valla Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Cowper same for both | |
| Member | Pat Conaghan same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Hyland Park | Valla Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Hyland Park
Other comparisons with Valla Beach
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.