Hughes vs Phillip
Phillip is the younger of the two, with a median age of 32 against 43 in Hughes. In Hughes, the large majority of households own their home, most homes are detached houses, and about half of households are couple families. In Phillip, about half of households rent, most homes are flats or apartments, and most households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Hughes: a median of $1.26 million, against $750,000 in Phillip, though rent is higher in Phillip. Hughes is closer to the city centre: 10.7 km, against 12.1 km. On these figures, Hughes tends to suit families with children, couples, and older residents, while Phillip suits renters, young adults, and people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Hughes
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more separate houses rather than flats (74% vs 0%)
- carries lower crime risk (19/100 vs 91/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (61% vs 29%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Hughes has cheaper units ($350,000 vs $535,000)
- Phillip has cheaper houses ($750,000 vs $1,260,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Hughes
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (14% vs 21%)
- has cheaper rent ($400/wk vs $440/wk)
- But Phillip has a bigger rental market to choose from (50% vs 25%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Phillip
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (92/100 vs 69/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Phillip
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more GPs (4 vs 0)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (100% vs 27%)
- is more walkable (92/100 vs 69/100)
- But Hughes carries lower crime risk (19/100 vs 91/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Phillip
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- is growing faster (77.0% vs 7.4%)
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (4.8% vs 4.0%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Hughes and Phillip drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Phillip has more residents (5,197 vs 3,210); Hughes has higher household incomes ($145,444 vs $107,900).
| Hughes | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,210 | 5,197 +62% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +7.4% | +77.0% |
| Median age | 43 | 32 |
| Median household income | $145,444/yr +26% vs other | $107,900/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $400/wk | $440/wk +10% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (36.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (28.7%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (8.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Hughes | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,260,000 | $750,000 |
| Median unit price | $350,000 | $535,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 21 days from 32 sales | 26 days from 8 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
7 vs 6 sales
32 vs 9 sales
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
8 vs 175 sales
5 vs 273 sales
Development activity
| Hughes | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 3,750 across Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -48% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Hughes | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.0% $850/wk on $1.09M | 4.8% $628/wk on $678K |
| Units | — | 6.2% $600/wk on $500K |
Ranking within ACT
| Hughes | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 81% of ACT | Higher than 15% of ACT |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 64% of ACT | Higher than 100% of ACT |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 94% of ACT | Higher than 49% of ACT |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 16% of ACT | Higher than 70% of ACT |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 35% of ACT | Higher than 85% of ACT |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 61% of ACT |
Liveability
Hughes scores higher overall (69 vs 45); Phillip is more walkable (92 vs 69).
| Hughes | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A | C |
| Score | 69/100 | 45/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Phillip carries more flood risk (40 vs 0); Phillip carries more crime risk (91 vs 19).
| Hughes | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 91/100 | High 89/100 |
| Crime | Low 19/100 | High 91/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 | Moderate 40/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 3 within 5 km |
Schools
| Hughes | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 UNSW Canberra, 4.9 km | 2 UNSW Canberra, 6.3 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.4% | 2.3% |
Schools in Hughes
- Hughes Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Phillip
- The Canberra College Government · Secondary
Amenities in the suburb
| Hughes | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 3 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 52 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 3 |
| Childcare | 3 | 5 |
| GPs | 0 | 4 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 4 |
| Police stations | 0 | 2 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 8 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 3 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 2 |
Mobility
| Hughes | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 69/100 | 92/100 |
| Distance to Canberra | 10.7 km | 12.1 km +13% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 16 min | 18 min |
| Public transport score | 63/100 Bus | 79/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 17.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 319.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 4.6% postcode 2605 | 3.4% postcode 2606 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 37 postcode 2605 | 20 postcode 2606 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (64.3%).
Setting
| Hughes | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 594 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 589 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Hughes | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 45/100 | 73/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 1,285 premises | 35% 3,650 premises |
Climate
| Hughes | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 686 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.2°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 0.9°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Hughes | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.4 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.1 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Hughes | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $3,105/yr same for both | |
| Council | Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Hughes | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Canberra | Bean |
| Member | Alicia Payne | David Smith |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Hughes | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | Not offered same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | None same for both | |
Tags
Hughes
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Hughes
Other comparisons with Phillip
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.