Horfield vs Cohuna
Horfield is the younger of the two, with a median age of 48 against 55 in Cohuna. In both, most households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and about half of households are people living alone. On these figures, Horfield tends to suit couples, while Cohuna suits older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Horfield is already more of a family suburb (50% vs 41%)
- Cohuna has more schools inside the suburb (3 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
Renters
Horfield
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (39% vs 19%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Horfield
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (192 min vs 202 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (267.7 km vs 277.1 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Cohuna
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more residents already 65 and over (37% vs 20%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Horfield and Cohuna drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Cohuna has more residents (2,415 vs 93); Cohuna skews older (55 vs 48).
| Horfield | Cohuna | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 93 | 2,415 +2497% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +2.2% | -0.5% |
| Median age | 48 | 55 |
| Median household income | $54,184/yr | $57,824/yr +7% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $183/wk | $185/wk +1% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.0%).
Property market
| Horfield | Cohuna | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $380,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $385,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 82 days from 29 sales |
Zoning mix
Horfield has more rural and farming land (96% vs 31%).
| Horfield | Cohuna | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 96% | 31% |
| Parks and recreation | 2% | 65% |
| Residential | 0% | 2% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 2% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Horfield | Cohuna | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 19 across Gannawarra same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Horfield | Cohuna | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 4.8% $402/wk on $434K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Horfield | Cohuna | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — | Higher than 5% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 13% of VIC | Higher than 16% of VIC |
| Schools | — | Higher than 64% of VIC |
| Walkability | Higher than 57% of VIC | Higher than 4% of VIC |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 92% of VIC |
| EV adoption | — same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 69% of VIC | Higher than 77% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 96% of VIC |
Liveability
| Horfield | Cohuna | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | D |
| Score | — | 29/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
Cohuna carries more bushfire risk (31 vs 0); Cohuna carries more flood risk (95 vs 78).
| Horfield | Cohuna | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Low 31/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 45/100 | Moderate 43/100 |
| Flood | High 78/100 | High 95/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Horfield | Cohuna | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 3 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 2 |
Schools in Horfield
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Cohuna
- Cohuna Consolidated School Government · Primary above peers
- Cohuna Secondary College Government · Secondary below peers
- St Mary's School Catholic · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Horfield | Cohuna | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 3 |
| Childcare | 0 | 1 |
| GPs | 0 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 2 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 3 | 14 |
Mobility
Cohuna sits further from the CBD (277.1 km vs 267.7 km).
| Horfield | Cohuna | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Melbourne | 267.7 km | 277.1 km +4% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 192 min | 202 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.0% postcode 3567 | 0.0% postcode 3568 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 56 postcode 3567 | 53 postcode 3568 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (83.0%).
Setting
| Horfield | Cohuna | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 83 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 84 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Horfield | Cohuna | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 67/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 41 premises | 42% 1,491 premises |
Climate
| Horfield | Cohuna | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 364 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 32.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 4.5°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Horfield | Cohuna | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,855/yr same for both | |
| Council | Gannawarra same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Horfield | Cohuna | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Mallee same for both | |
| Member | Anne Webster same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Horfield | Cohuna | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Horfield
Cohuna
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Horfield
Other comparisons with Cohuna
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.