Hopkins Creek vs Numinbah
Hopkins Creek is the younger of the two, with a median age of 46 against 50 in Numinbah. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Hopkins Creek, most households are couple families. In Numinbah, most households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Numinbah: a median of $1.11 million, against $501,000 in Hopkins Creek, though rent is higher in Hopkins Creek. On these figures, Hopkins Creek tends to suit couples and buyers on a tighter budget, while Numinbah suits people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Hopkins Creek
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (0/100 vs 35/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (76% vs 43%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Hopkins Creek
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- has cheaper houses ($501,000 vs $1,110,000)
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (22% vs 39%)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Numinbah
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- has cheaper rent ($100/wk vs $550/wk)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (9% vs 40%)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Hopkins Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (18/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Hopkins Creek
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (0/100 vs 35/100)
- is more walkable (18/100 vs 0/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (19% vs 11%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Hopkins Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (23.0% vs -31.0%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Hopkins Creek and Numinbah drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Hopkins Creek rents higher ($550/wk vs $100/wk); Hopkins Creek has more residents (139 vs 89).
| Hopkins Creek | Numinbah | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 139 +36% vs other | 89 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +23.0% | -31.0% |
| Median age | 46 | 50 |
| Median household income | $71,500/yr +18% vs other | $58,500/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $550/wk +82% vs other | $100/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (9.0%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (14.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Hopkins Creek | Numinbah | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $501,000 | $1,110,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
Numinbah has more land zoned for conservation (32% vs 1%); Hopkins Creek has more rural and farming land (80% vs 59%).
| Hopkins Creek | Numinbah | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 80% | 59% |
| Environmental | 1% | 32% |
| Other and special use | 19% | 9% |
| Planning zones cover 100% of Hopkins Creek and 99% of Numinbah. The rest is unzoned land such as water or road reserve. | ||
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Hopkins Creek | Numinbah | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 331 across Tweed same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -50% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Hopkins Creek | Numinbah | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 15% of NSW | Higher than 58% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 37% of NSW | Higher than 20% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 68% of NSW | Higher than 44% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 85% of NSW | Higher than 19% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 64% of NSW | Higher than 65% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 24% of NSW | Higher than 33% of NSW |
Liveability
Hopkins Creek is more walkable (18 vs 0).
| Hopkins Creek | Numinbah | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Numinbah carries more crime risk (35 vs 0); Numinbah carries more bushfire risk (41 vs 30).
| Hopkins Creek | Numinbah | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 30/100 | Moderate 41/100 |
| Crime | None 0/100 | Low 35/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Hopkins Creek | Numinbah | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Hopkins Creek | Numinbah | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 2 |
| Waterways | 5 | 9 |
Mobility
| Hopkins Creek | Numinbah | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 18/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 818.4 km | 819.1 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 552 min | 551 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 2484 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 76 postcode 2484 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (82.1%).
Setting
| Hopkins Creek | Numinbah | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 183 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 259 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 29.7 km | 25.8 km |
NBN connectivity
| Hopkins Creek | Numinbah | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 16/100 | 23/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 27 premises | 0% 29 premises |
Climate
| Hopkins Creek | Numinbah | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,569 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 9.1°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Hopkins Creek | Numinbah | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,745/yr same for both | |
| Council | Tweed same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Hopkins Creek | Numinbah | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Richmond same for both | |
| Member | Justine Elliot same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Hopkins Creek | Numinbah | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Hopkins Creek
Numinbah
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Hopkins Creek
Other comparisons with Numinbah
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.