Holt vs Latham
In both, most households own their home and most homes are detached houses. On these figures, Holt tends to suit people living alone.
Holt has a larger population of 5628 people compared to Latham's 3767, and offers better walkability at 68 versus 59. However, Latham residents earn a higher median household income of $110,500 versus Holt's $103,116, and enjoy a notably lower crime risk score of 33 compared to Holt's 78. Flood risk is a key differentiator: Holt has none while Latham scores 52. Both suburbs are equally affluent by socio-economic decile, though Holt's median unit prices are considerably higher at $620,000 versus Latham's $450,000.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Latham
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (33/100 vs 78/100)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (88% vs 59%)
- is already more of a family suburb (62% vs 52%)
- But Holt has more parks and reserves (4 vs 1)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Latham
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper units ($450,000 vs $620,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Holt
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (68/100 vs 59/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Holt
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more GPs (4 vs 0)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (41% vs 12%)
- is more walkable (68/100 vs 59/100)
- But Latham carries lower crime risk (33/100 vs 78/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Holt
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- is growing faster (21.8% vs 3.7%)
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (4.7% vs 3.9%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Holt and Latham drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Holt has more residents (5,628 vs 3,767); Latham skews older (38 vs 36).
| Holt | Latham | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,628 +33% vs other | 3,767 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +21.8% | +3.7% |
| Median age | 36 | 38 |
| Median household income | $103,116/yr | $110,500/yr +7% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $396/wk | $400/wk +1% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.4%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.3%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Holt | Latham | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $822,000 | $850,000 |
| Median unit price | $620,000 | $450,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 21 days from 76 sales | 21 days from 56 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
12 vs 6 sales
64 vs 44 sales
23 vs 24 sales
Development activity
| Holt | Latham | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 3,750 across Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -48% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Holt | Latham | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.7% $680/wk on $749K | 3.9% $700/wk on $935K |
| Units | 6.7% $598/wk on $464K | — |
Ranking within ACT
| Holt | Latham | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 12% of ACT | Higher than 18% of ACT |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 59% of ACT | Higher than 44% of ACT |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 12% of ACT | Higher than 15% of ACT |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 52% of ACT | Higher than 21% of ACT |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 80% of ACT | Higher than 27% of ACT |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 78% of ACT | — |
Liveability
Holt is more walkable (68 vs 59).
| Holt | Latham | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C same for both | |
| Score | 35/100 | 39/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Latham carries more flood risk (52 vs 0); Holt carries more crime risk (78 vs 33).
| Holt | Latham | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 46/100 | Low 29/100 |
| Crime | High 78/100 | Low 33/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 | Moderate 52/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Holt | Latham | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 UC - Canberra, Bruce, 7.6 km | 2 UC - Canberra, Bruce, 6.3 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 1.5% | 2.0% |
Schools in Holt
- Kingsford Smith School Government · Combined
- Cranleigh School Government · Primary · Special school
Schools in Latham
- Latham Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Holt | Latham | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 4 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 10 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 1 |
| Childcare | 4 | 2 |
| GPs | 4 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 2 | 0 |
| EV chargers | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
| Holt | Latham | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 68/100 | 59/100 |
| Distance to Canberra | 14.9 km +5% vs other | 14.1 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 22 min | 21 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus | 78/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 217.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 60.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.1% postcode 2615 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 40 postcode 2615 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (77.1%).
Setting
| Holt | Latham | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 576 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 562 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Holt | Latham | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 57/100 | 46/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 22% 2,692 premises | 2% 1,514 premises |
Climate
| Holt | Latham | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 622 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 0.8°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Holt | Latham | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.6 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 11.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.41 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Holt | Latham | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $3,105/yr same for both | |
| Council | Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Holt | Latham | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Fenner same for both | |
| Member | Andrew Leigh same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Holt | Latham | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | Not offered same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | None same for both | |
Tags
Latham
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Holt
Other comparisons with Latham
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.