Hocking vs Pearsall
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Hocking, most households are couple families. In Pearsall, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Hocking: a median of $935,000, against $845,000 in Pearsall.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Pearsall
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Pearsall
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($845,000 vs $935,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Too close to call
Nothing among the 4 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Too close to call
Nothing among the 5 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Hocking
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (18.1% vs 9.9%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Hocking and Pearsall drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Hocking has more residents (6,987 vs 4,244).
| Hocking | Pearsall | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,987 +39% vs other | 4,244 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +18.1% | +9.9% |
| Median age | 34 same for both | |
| Median household income | $116,168/yr +9% vs other | $106,184/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $400/wk same for both | |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (9.8%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Hocking | Pearsall | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $935,000 | $845,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $860,500 |
| Median land price | — | $599,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 28 days from 70 sales | 12 days from 63 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
45 vs 54 sales
75 vs 81 sales
Development activity
| Hocking | Pearsall | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 4,125 across Wanneroo same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +17% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Hocking | Pearsall | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.2% $755/wk on $928K | 4.3% $750/wk on $900K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within WA
| Hocking | Pearsall | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 81% of WA | Higher than 72% of WA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 94% of WA | Higher than 93% of WA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 86% of WA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 91% of WA | Higher than 92% of WA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 40% of WA | Higher than 48% of WA |
Liveability
| Hocking | Pearsall | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A same for both | |
| Score | 80/100 | 79/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
| Hocking | Pearsall | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 29/100 | Low 24/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 7 within 5 km | 9 within 5 km |
Schools
| Hocking | Pearsall | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 2 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 ECU Joondalup Campus, 5.8 km | 1 ECU Joondalup Campus, 6.7 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 1.9% same for both | |
Schools in Hocking
- Hocking Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- St Elizabeth's Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary at peers
Schools in Pearsall
- Pearsall Primary School Government · Primary above peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Hocking | Pearsall | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 2 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 same for both | |
| Parks & reserves | 5 same for both | |
| Childcare | 4 | 2 |
| GPs | 2 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 2 | 1 |
Mobility
| Hocking | Pearsall | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 79/100 | 77/100 |
| Distance to Perth | 28.6 km +5% vs other | 27.1 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 27 min | 26 min |
| Public transport score | 94/100 Bus | 85/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 59.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 44.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.2% postcode 6065 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 79 postcode 6065 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (79.4%).
Setting
| Hocking | Pearsall | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 72 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 80 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 8.2 km | 8.1 km |
NBN connectivity
| Hocking | Pearsall | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 79/100 | 81/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 60% 2,638 premises | 53% 1,724 premises |
Climate
| Hocking | Pearsall | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 650 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Hocking | Pearsall | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,060/yr same for both | |
| Council | Wanneroo same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Hocking | Pearsall | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Pearce same for both | |
| Member | Tracey Roberts same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Hocking | Pearsall | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $800,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Hocking
Pearsall
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Hocking
Other comparisons with Pearsall
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.