Hawthorn vs Lower Mitcham
In both, the large majority of households own their home, most homes are detached houses, and about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Hawthorn: a median of $1.8 million, against $1.57 million in Lower Mitcham, though rent is higher in Lower Mitcham. Hawthorn is closer to the city centre: 6.1 km, against 7 km.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Hawthorn has more parks and reserves (7 vs 3)
- Lower Mitcham carries lower crime risk (21/100 vs 69/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Hawthorn has cheaper units ($571,083 vs $860,000)
- Lower Mitcham has cheaper houses ($1,575,000 vs $1,800,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Hawthorn
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($295/wk vs $346/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Too close to call
Nothing among the 4 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Hawthorn has more GPs (2 vs 0)
- Lower Mitcham carries lower crime risk (21/100 vs 69/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Hawthorn and Lower Mitcham drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Lower Mitcham rents higher ($346/wk vs $295/wk); Hawthorn has higher household incomes ($123,240 vs $106,340).
| Hawthorn | Lower Mitcham | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,221 +2% vs other | 2,187 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +2.5% | +1.6% |
| Median age | 43 | 45 |
| Median household income | $123,240/yr +14% vs other | $106,340/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $295/wk | $346/wk +17% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (26.0%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Hawthorn | Lower Mitcham | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,800,000 | $1,575,000 |
| Median unit price | $571,083 | $860,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 19 days from 7 sales | 35 days from 23 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
12 vs 18 sales
5 vs 17 sales
Zoning mix
| Hawthorn | Lower Mitcham | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 90% | 96% |
| Commercial | 5% | 4% |
| Parks and recreation | 4% | 0% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 1% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Hawthorn | Lower Mitcham | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 188 across Mitcham same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +32% same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Hawthorn | Lower Mitcham | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 91% of SA | Higher than 74% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 94% of SA | — |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 99% of SA | Higher than 96% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 25% of SA | — |
| EV adoption | Higher than 97% of SA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 91% of SA | Higher than 98% of SA |
Liveability
Lower Mitcham scores higher overall (87 vs 75).
| Hawthorn | Lower Mitcham | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A | A+ |
| Score | 75/100 | 87/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Hawthorn carries more crime risk (69 vs 21); Hawthorn carries more flood risk (75 vs 59).
| Hawthorn | Lower Mitcham | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 69/100 | Low 21/100 |
| Flood | High 75/100 | Moderate 59/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 5 within 5 km | 4 within 5 km |
Schools
| Hawthorn | Lower Mitcham | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Tonsley, 4.3 km | 3 Tonsley, 3.7 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 4.6% | 3.5% |
Amenities in the suburb
| Hawthorn | Lower Mitcham | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 4 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | 3 |
| Childcare | 2 | 0 |
| GPs | 2 | 0 |
| Waterways | 6 | 0 |
Mobility
| Hawthorn | Lower Mitcham | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 91/100 | 87/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 6.1 km | 7 km +15% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 13 min | 14 min |
| Public transport score | 90/100 Rail · Bus | 80/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 80.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 15.5 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 2 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.5% postcode 5062 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 63 postcode 5062 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (68.4%).
Setting
| Hawthorn | Lower Mitcham | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 67 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 71 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 8.4 km | 8.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Hawthorn | Lower Mitcham | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 77/100 | 98/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 32% 1,062 premises | 90% 957 premises |
Climate
| Hawthorn | Lower Mitcham | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 457 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Hawthorn | Lower Mitcham | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 1.12 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Hawthorn | Lower Mitcham | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,296/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mitcham same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Hawthorn | Lower Mitcham | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Boothby same for both | |
| Member | Louise Miller-Frost same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Hawthorn | Lower Mitcham | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Hawthorn
Lower Mitcham
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Hawthorn
Other comparisons with Lower Mitcham
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.