Hassall Grove vs Marsden Park
In both, most households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Marsden Park: a median of $1.23 million, against $1.12 million in Hassall Grove, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Marsden Park tends to suit families with children and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Marsden Park
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (4 vs 1)
- has more childcare (9 vs 3)
- has more schools inside the suburb (5 vs 2)
- But Hassall Grove has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Hassall Grove
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($410/wk vs $570/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Hassall Grove
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (75/100 vs 37/100)
- has a shorter drive in (42 min vs 47 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (47 km vs 51.1 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Hassall Grove
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (75/100 vs 37/100)
- carries lower crime risk (50/100 vs 67/100)
- But Marsden Park has more GPs (3 vs 1)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Where they sit
Hassall Grove and Marsden Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Marsden Park has more residents (14,610 vs 4,401); Marsden Park rents higher ($570/wk vs $410/wk).
| Hassall Grove | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,401 | 14,610 +232% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -2.3% | — |
| Median age | 32 same for both | |
| Median household income | $104,936/yr | $141,544/yr +35% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $410/wk | $570/wk +39% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.2%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Hassall Grove | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,120,000 | $1,230,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $530,000 |
| Median land price | — | $1,035,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 31 days from 19 sales | 39 days from 246 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
24 vs 26 sales
16 vs 161 sales
6 vs 99 sales
Zoning mix
Marsden Park has more industrially zoned land (16% vs 0%); Marsden Park has more rural and farming land (14% vs 0%).
| Hassall Grove | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 76% | 31% |
| Industrial | 0% | 16% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 12% | 16% |
| Rural and farming | 0% | 14% |
| Parks and recreation | 11% | 7% |
| Commercial | 1% | 10% |
| Other and special use | 0% | 4% |
| Environmental | 0% | 3% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Hassall Grove | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 2,325 across Blacktown same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -18% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Hassall Grove | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 3.7% $875/wk on $1.24M |
| Units | — | 4.7% $600/wk on $670K |
Ranking within NSW
| Hassall Grove | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 51% of NSW | Higher than 59% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 71% of NSW | Higher than 92% of NSW |
| Schools | — | Higher than 19% of NSW |
| Walkability | Higher than 90% of NSW | Higher than 77% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 68% of NSW | Higher than 78% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 76% of NSW | Higher than 96% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 84% of NSW | Higher than 98% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 55% of NSW |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 51% of NSW |
Liveability
Hassall Grove is more walkable (75 vs 37); Hassall Grove scores higher overall (61 vs 47).
| Hassall Grove | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | C |
| Score | 61/100 | 47/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
Marsden Park carries more bushfire risk (38 vs 0); Marsden Park carries more crime risk (67 vs 50).
| Hassall Grove | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Low 38/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 50/100 | Moderate 67/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 7 within 5 km | 3 within 5 km |
Schools
| Hassall Grove | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 | 5 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 3 |
Schools in Hassall Grove
- St Clare's Catholic High School Catholic · Secondary above peers
- Hassall Grove Public School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Marsden Park
- St Luke's Catholic College (Secondary) Catholic · Secondary at peers
- Marsden Park Anglican College Independent · Combined below peers
- Marsden Park Public School Government · Primary below peers
- St Luke’s Catholic College (Primary) Catholic · Primary below peers
- St Luke's Arrunga Catholic · Combined · Special school
Amenities in the suburb
| Hassall Grove | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 2 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 4 |
| Childcare | 3 | 9 |
| GPs | 1 | 3 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 2 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 4 |
| Waterways | 0 | 2 |
Mobility
Marsden Park sits further from the CBD (51.1 km vs 47 km).
| Hassall Grove | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 75/100 | 37/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 47 km | 51.1 km +9% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 42 min | 47 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 84.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 211.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.9% postcode 2761 | 2.7% postcode 2765 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 64 postcode 2761 | — postcode 2765 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (62.3%).
Setting
| Hassall Grove | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 43 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 46 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 38.7 km | 39.4 km |
NBN connectivity
| Hassall Grove | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 75/100 | 98/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 1,332 premises | 96% 6,110 premises |
Climate
| Hassall Grove | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 932 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Hassall Grove | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.1 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 15.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.53 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Hassall Grove | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,157/yr same for both | |
| Council | Blacktown same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Hassall Grove | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Chifley same for both | |
| Member | Ed Husic same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Hassall Grove | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Hassall Grove
Marsden Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Hassall Grove
Other comparisons with Marsden Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.