Harcourt North vs Sedgwick
Sedgwick is the younger of the two, with a median age of 47 against 55 in Harcourt North. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Harcourt North, about half of households are couple families. In Sedgwick, most households are couple families. On these figures, Harcourt North tends to suit people living alone and older residents, while Sedgwick suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Sedgwick
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (20/100 vs 45/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (74% vs 58%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Harcourt North
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($285/wk vs $335/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Harcourt North
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (129.3 km vs 134.9 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Harcourt North has more residents already 65 and over (25% vs 17%)
- Sedgwick carries lower crime risk (20/100 vs 45/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Harcourt North and Sedgwick drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Sedgwick has more residents (614 vs 291); Sedgwick rents higher ($335/wk vs $285/wk).
| Harcourt North | Sedgwick | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 291 | 614 +111% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +9.8% | +12.5% |
| Median age | 55 | 47 |
| Median household income | $111,592/yr | $124,332/yr +11% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $285/wk | $335/wk +18% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (25.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (2.9%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.5%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Harcourt North | Sedgwick | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $1,550,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $612,500 |
Zoning mix
Sedgwick has more rural and farming land (73% vs 52%); Harcourt North has more land zoned for conservation (22% vs 5%).
| Harcourt North | Sedgwick | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 52% | 73% |
| Parks and recreation | 23% | 19% |
| Environmental | 22% | 5% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 3% same for both | |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Harcourt North | Sedgwick | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 885 across Greater Bendigo same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +28% same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Harcourt North | Sedgwick | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 84% of VIC | Higher than 93% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 58% of VIC | Higher than 56% of VIC |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 33% of VIC | Higher than 56% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 46% of VIC same for both | |
Liveability
| Harcourt North | Sedgwick | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | B |
| Score | — | 65/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Harcourt North carries more crime risk (45 vs 20); Harcourt North carries more bushfire risk (65 vs 33).
| Harcourt North | Sedgwick | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 65/100 | Low 33/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 45/100 | Low 20/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Harcourt North | Sedgwick | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Harcourt North | Sedgwick | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 1 |
| Waterways | 7 | 8 |
Mobility
Sedgwick sits further from the CBD (134.9 km vs 129.3 km).
| Harcourt North | Sedgwick | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Melbourne | 129.3 km | 134.9 km +4% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 92 min | 96 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 3453 | 0.6% postcode 3551 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 72 postcode 3453 | 64 postcode 3551 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (61.9%).
Setting
| Harcourt North | Sedgwick | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 381 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 318 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Harcourt North | Sedgwick | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 29/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 130 premises | 0% 219 premises |
Climate
| Harcourt North | Sedgwick | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 598 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 27.9°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 3.7°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Harcourt North | Sedgwick | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,949/yr same for both | |
| Council | Greater Bendigo same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Harcourt North | Sedgwick | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Bendigo same for both | |
| Member | Lisa Chesters same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Harcourt North | Sedgwick | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Harcourt North
Sedgwick
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Harcourt North
Other comparisons with Sedgwick
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.