Hampshire vs Upper Natone
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Hampshire, most households are couple families. On these figures, Hampshire tends to suit couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Hampshire
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is already more of a family suburb (60% vs 48%)
Weighs schools, house stock, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Upper Natone
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (15% vs 23%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Hampshire
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($0/wk vs $235/wk)
Weighs rent.
Commuting to the city
Upper Natone
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (238 min vs 254 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (336 km vs 356.4 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Upper Natone
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more residents already 65 and over (12% vs 6%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, and walkability.
Investors
Hampshire
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (5.9% vs -0.9%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Hampshire and Upper Natone drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Upper Natone rents higher ($235/wk vs $0/wk); Upper Natone has more residents (111 vs 54).
| Hampshire | Upper Natone | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 54 | 111 +106% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +5.9% | -0.9% |
| Median age | 49 same for both | |
| Median household income | $58,448/yr | $78,936/yr +35% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | — | $235/wk (not reported on the other side) |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.5%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.1%).
Zoning mix
| Hampshire | Upper Natone | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 90% | 89% |
| Environmental | 9% | 11% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Hampshire | Upper Natone | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 90 across Burnie same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +1200% same for both | |
Ranking within TAS
| Hampshire | Upper Natone | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 32% of TAS | Higher than 70% of TAS |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 66% of TAS | Higher than 19% of TAS |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 46% of TAS | Higher than 43% of TAS |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 21% of TAS | Higher than 22% of TAS |
Liveability
| Hampshire | Upper Natone | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 2/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 |
Risk profile
| Hampshire | Upper Natone | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 16/100 | Low 19/100 |
| Crime | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Hampshire | Upper Natone | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Hampshire | Upper Natone | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 3 |
| Waterways | 11 | 17 |
Mobility
Hampshire sits further from the CBD (356.4 km vs 336 km).
| Hampshire | Upper Natone | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Hobart | 356.4 km +6% vs other | 336 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 254 min | 238 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 7321 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 26 postcode 7321 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (100.0%).
Setting
| Hampshire | Upper Natone | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 520 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 383 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 30.2 km | 19.3 km |
NBN connectivity
| Hampshire | Upper Natone | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 16/100 | 18/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 17 premises | 0% 55 premises |
Climate
| Hampshire | Upper Natone | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,809 mm | 929 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | — | 21.8°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | — | 3.8°C |
Council rates
| Hampshire | Upper Natone | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,050/yr same for both | |
| Council | Burnie same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Hampshire | Upper Natone | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Braddon same for both | |
| Member | Anne Urquhart same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Hampshire | Upper Natone | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $20,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Hampshire
Other comparisons with Upper Natone
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.