Hale vs Mount Johns
Mount Johns is the younger of the two, with a median age of 35 against 40 in Hale. In both, most households are people living alone. In Hale, most households own their home and most homes are detached houses. In Mount Johns, most households rent. On these figures, Mount Johns tends to suit renters, young adults, and families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Hale
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (5 vs 0)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (65% vs 24%)
Weighs schools, house stock, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Mount Johns
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (22% vs 86%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Hale
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper rent ($10/wk vs $345/wk)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (2% vs 15%)
- But Mount Johns has a bigger rental market to choose from (67% vs 40%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Mount Johns
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (973 min vs 1829 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (1506 km vs 1657.8 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Mount Johns
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (76% vs 35%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, and walkability.
Investors
Mount Johns
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (-1.3% vs -8.9%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Hale and Mount Johns drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mount Johns rents higher ($345/wk vs $10/wk); Mount Johns has more residents (541 vs 72).
| Hale | Mount Johns | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 72 | 541 +651% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -8.9% | -1.3% |
| Median age | 40 | 35 |
| Median household income | $24,232/yr | $117,988/yr +387% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $10/wk | $345/wk +3350% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (29.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.8%).
Property market
| Hale | Mount Johns | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $550,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $195,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Development activity
| Hale | Mount Johns | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 7 across MacDonnell | 30 across Alice Springs |
| Approvals change year on year | -100% | +25% |
Gross rental yield
| Hale | Mount Johns | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — same for both | |
| Units | — | 10.0% $375/wk on $195K |
Ranking within NT
| Hale | Mount Johns | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 3% of NT | Higher than 81% of NT |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 11% of NT | Higher than 54% of NT |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | — same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 10% of NT | Higher than 69% of NT |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 100% of NT |
Liveability
| Hale | Mount Johns | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | B |
| Score | — | 57/100 |
| Socio-economic band | high-need area decile 1/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
| Hale | Mount Johns | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Crime | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Hale | Mount Johns | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Hale | Mount Johns | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 0 |
| Waterways | 14 | 0 |
Mobility
Hale sits further from the CBD (1657.8 km vs 1506 km).
| Hale | Mount Johns | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 6/100 |
| Distance to Darwin | 1657.8 km +9% vs other | 1506 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 1829 min | 973 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.0% postcode 0872 | 0.0% postcode 0874 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 8 postcode 0872 | 8 postcode 0874 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (71.5%).
Setting
| Hale | Mount Johns | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 336 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 623 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Hale | Mount Johns | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 15/100 | 56/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fibre to the node |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 27 premises | 20% 350 premises |
Climate
| Hale | Mount Johns | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | — | 285 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | — | 36.6°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | — | 4.5°C |
Council rates
| Hale | Mount Johns | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,387/yr | $2,106/yr |
| Council | MacDonnell | Alice Springs |
Federal electorate
| Hale | Mount Johns | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Lingiari same for both | |
| Member | Marion Scrymgour same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Hale | Mount Johns | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $50,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Hale
Mount Johns
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Hale
Other comparisons with Mount Johns
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.