Hackham vs Onkaparinga Hills
Hackham is the younger of the two, with a median age of 40 against 45 in Onkaparinga Hills. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Onkaparinga Hills, most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Onkaparinga Hills: a median of $988,000, against $737,000 in Hackham, and rent is higher there too. Onkaparinga Hills is closer to the city centre: 27.2 km, against 32.5 km. On these figures, Hackham tends to suit people living alone and buyers on a tighter budget, while Onkaparinga Hills suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Onkaparinga Hills
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (21/100 vs 64/100)
- has more parks and reserves (8 vs 3)
- is already more of a family suburb (79% vs 52%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Hackham has cheaper houses ($737,000 vs $988,000)
- Onkaparinga Hills leaves households under less mortgage stress (18% vs 26%)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Hackham
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (24% vs 4%)
- has cheaper rent ($297/wk vs $385/wk)
- But Onkaparinga Hills leaves renters under less rental stress (18% vs 26%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Onkaparinga Hills
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (32 min vs 39 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (27.2 km vs 32.5 km)
- But Hackham is more walkable (63/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Hackham
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (63/100 vs 0/100)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (12% vs 1%)
- has more residents already 65 and over (23% vs 18%)
- But Onkaparinga Hills carries lower crime risk (21/100 vs 64/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Hackham
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (12.0% vs 3.2%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Hackham and Onkaparinga Hills drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Onkaparinga Hills has higher household incomes ($108,056 vs $60,216); Hackham has more residents (4,491 vs 2,610).
| Hackham | Onkaparinga Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,491 +42% vs other | 2,610 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +12.0% | +3.2% |
| Median age | 40 | 45 |
| Median household income | $60,216/yr | $108,056/yr +79% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $297/wk | $385/wk +30% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.2%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (10.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Hackham | Onkaparinga Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $737,000 | $988,000 |
| Median unit price | $545,000 | — |
| Median land price | $842,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 21 days from 35 sales | 22 days from 20 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
66 vs 13 sales
17 vs 28 sales
Zoning mix
Onkaparinga Hills has more land zoned for conservation (95% vs 6%).
| Hackham | Onkaparinga Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | 6% | 95% |
| Residential | 86% | 5% |
| Industrial | 7% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Hackham | Onkaparinga Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,367 across Onkaparinga same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +58% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Hackham | Onkaparinga Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.3% $600/wk on $721K | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Hackham | Onkaparinga Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 12% of SA | Higher than 40% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 28% of SA | Higher than 85% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 85% of SA | Higher than 8% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 57% of SA | Higher than 89% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 50% of SA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 82% of SA | Higher than 81% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 81% of SA | — |
Liveability
Hackham is more walkable (63 vs 0); Onkaparinga Hills scores higher overall (54 vs 40).
| Hackham | Onkaparinga Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | B |
| Score | 40/100 | 54/100 |
| Socio-economic band | high-need area decile 1/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
Hackham carries more crime risk (64 vs 21); Onkaparinga Hills carries more bushfire risk (43 vs 19).
| Hackham | Onkaparinga Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 19/100 | Moderate 43/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 64/100 | Low 21/100 |
| Flood | Low 28/100 | — |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 3 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Hackham | Onkaparinga Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Hackham
- Hackham East Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Onkaparinga Hills
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Hackham | Onkaparinga Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 3 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 6 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 8 |
| Childcare | 2 | 0 |
| GPs | 1 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 2 | 0 |
| Waterways | 1 same for both | |
Mobility
Hackham sits further from the CBD (32.5 km vs 27.2 km).
| Hackham | Onkaparinga Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 63/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 32.5 km +16% vs other | 27.2 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 39 min | 32 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus | 55/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 63.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 19.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.5% postcode 5163 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 67 postcode 5163 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (82.0%).
Setting
| Hackham | Onkaparinga Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 80 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 234 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 4.8 km | 8.8 km |
NBN connectivity
| Hackham | Onkaparinga Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 70/100 | 68/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 46% 2,307 premises | 45% 953 premises |
Climate
| Hackham | Onkaparinga Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 394 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 7.8°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Hackham | Onkaparinga Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | — same for both | |
| PM10 | 19.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.34 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Hackham | Onkaparinga Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,008/yr same for both | |
| Council | Onkaparinga same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Hackham | Onkaparinga Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Kingston same for both | |
| Member | Amanda Rishworth same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Hackham | Onkaparinga Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Hackham
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Hackham
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.