Gungahlin vs Throsby
In Gungahlin, about half of households rent and about half of homes are flats or apartments. In Throsby, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and the large majority of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Throsby: a median of $1.11 million, against $985,000 in Gungahlin, though rent is higher in Gungahlin. On these figures, Gungahlin tends to suit renters, young adults, and people living alone, while Throsby suits families with children and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Throsby
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more separate houses rather than flats (90% vs 36%)
- carries lower crime risk (44/100 vs 84/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (84% vs 53%)
- But Gungahlin has more parks and reserves (5 vs 1)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Gungahlin
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper units ($426,500 vs $705,000)
- has cheaper houses ($985,000 vs $1,110,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Throsby
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (12% vs 20%)
- has cheaper rent ($375/wk vs $450/wk)
- But Gungahlin has a bigger rental market to choose from (54% vs 23%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Gungahlin
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- gets more of its commuters onto trains and trams (8% vs 2%)
- is more walkable (86/100 vs 58/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Gungahlin
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more GPs (9 vs 0)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (64% vs 10%)
- is more walkable (86/100 vs 58/100)
- But Throsby carries lower crime risk (44/100 vs 84/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Throsby
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (5.2% vs 4.3%)
Weighs house yield.
Where they sit
Gungahlin and Throsby drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Gungahlin has more residents (8,586 vs 2,405); Throsby has higher household incomes ($165,412 vs $114,816).
| Gungahlin | Throsby | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,586 +72% vs other | 2,405 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +40.0% | — |
| Median age | 31 same for both | |
| Median household income | $114,816/yr | $165,412/yr +44% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $450/wk +17% vs other | $375/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (27.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.4%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (13.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Gungahlin | Throsby | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $985,000 | $1,110,000 |
| Median unit price | $426,500 | $705,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 24 days from 56 sales | 23 days from 29 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
23 vs 16 sales
31 vs 37 sales
9 vs 8 sales
Development activity
| Gungahlin | Throsby | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 3,750 across Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -48% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Gungahlin | Throsby | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.3% $720/wk on $875K | 5.2% $848/wk on $849K |
| Units | 6.7% $565/wk on $439K | — |
Ranking within ACT
| Gungahlin | Throsby | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 26% of ACT | Higher than 91% of ACT |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 96% of ACT | Higher than 42% of ACT |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 28% of ACT | Higher than 54% of ACT |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 93% of ACT | Higher than 84% of ACT |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 46% of ACT | Higher than 89% of ACT |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 76% of ACT | — |
Liveability
Gungahlin is more walkable (86 vs 58); Throsby scores higher overall (57 vs 39).
| Gungahlin | Throsby | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | B |
| Score | 39/100 | 57/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
Gungahlin carries more flood risk (42 vs 0); Gungahlin carries more crime risk (84 vs 44).
| Gungahlin | Throsby | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 90/100 | High 94/100 |
| Crime | High 84/100 | Moderate 44/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 42/100 | None 0/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km | 3 within 5 km |
Schools
| Gungahlin | Throsby | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
| Universities within 10 km | 2 UC - Canberra, Bruce, 7.7 km | 1 UC - Canberra, Bruce, 8.9 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 3.1% | 1.7% |
Schools in Gungahlin
- Burgmann Anglican School Independent · Combined
- Gungahlin College Government · Secondary
Schools in Throsby
- Throsby School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Gungahlin | Throsby | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 2 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 28 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 1 |
| Childcare | 11 | 5 |
| GPs | 9 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 3 | 0 |
| Police stations | 2 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 7 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 2 | 0 |
| EV chargers | 3 | 0 |
| Waterways | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
| Gungahlin | Throsby | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 86/100 | 58/100 |
| Distance to Canberra | 13.5 km +4% vs other | 13 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 20 min | 22 min |
| Public transport score | 94/100 Tram · Bus | 45/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 200.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 9.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.5% postcode 2912 | 3.7% postcode 2914 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 19 postcode 2912 | 47 postcode 2914 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (75.3%).
Setting
| Gungahlin | Throsby | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 627 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 619 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Gungahlin | Throsby | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 100/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 100% 3,690 premises | 100% 1,161 premises |
Climate
| Gungahlin | Throsby | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 622 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 0.8°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Gungahlin | Throsby | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.6 µg/m³ | 5.4 µg/m³ |
| PM10 | 11.0 µg/m³ | 14.1 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | 0.41 pphm | — |
Council rates
| Gungahlin | Throsby | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $3,105/yr same for both | |
| Council | Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Gungahlin | Throsby | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Fenner same for both | |
| Member | Andrew Leigh same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Gungahlin | Throsby | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | Not offered same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | None same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Gungahlin
Other comparisons with Throsby
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.