Gungahlin vs Nicholls
Gungahlin is the younger of the two, with a median age of 31 against 44 in Nicholls. In Gungahlin, about half of households rent and about half of homes are flats or apartments. In Nicholls, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Nicholls: a median of $1.23 million, against $985,000 in Gungahlin, and rent is higher there too. Gungahlin is closer to the city centre: 13.5 km, against 15.4 km. On these figures, Gungahlin tends to suit renters, young adults, and people living alone, while Nicholls suits couples.
Gungahlin and Nicholls are quite different in character. Gungahlin is younger (median age 31 versus 44) and more walkable with a score of 86 compared to Nicholls' 50, though it sits closer to the CBD at 13.5 km. Nicholls has a notably higher median household income of $162,968 against Gungahlin's $114,816, and property prices are substantially higher across both houses and units. Gungahlin may suit those prioritising walkability and proximity to the city centre, while Nicholls appeals to buyers seeking a more affluent, established neighbourhood with higher incomes and property values.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Nicholls
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools rated above their peers (2 vs 0)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (89% vs 36%)
- carries lower crime risk (43/100 vs 84/100)
- But Gungahlin has more parks and reserves (5 vs 2)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Gungahlin
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper units ($426,500 vs $800,000)
- has cheaper houses ($985,000 vs $1,227,500)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Gungahlin
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (54% vs 15%)
- has cheaper rent ($450/wk vs $502/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Gungahlin
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- gets more of its commuters onto trains and trams (8% vs 0%)
- is more walkable (86/100 vs 50/100)
- has a shorter drive in (20 min vs 30 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Gungahlin
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more GPs (9 vs 1)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (64% vs 11%)
- is more walkable (86/100 vs 50/100)
- But Nicholls has more residents already 65 and over (17% vs 6%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Gungahlin
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (40.0% vs -2.7%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Gungahlin and Nicholls drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Nicholls has higher household incomes ($162,968 vs $114,816); Nicholls skews older (44 vs 31).
| Gungahlin | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,586 +22% vs other | 6,680 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +40.0% | -2.7% |
| Median age | 31 | 44 |
| Median household income | $114,816/yr | $162,968/yr +42% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $450/wk | $502/wk +12% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (27.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.4%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (8.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Gungahlin | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $985,000 | $1,227,500 |
| Median unit price | $426,500 | $800,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 24 days from 56 sales | 22 days from 86 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
23 vs 24 sales
31 vs 62 sales
9 vs 27 sales
Development activity
| Gungahlin | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 3,750 across Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -48% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Gungahlin | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.3% $720/wk on $875K | 4.5% $750/wk on $875K |
| Units | 6.7% $565/wk on $439K | — |
Ranking within ACT
| Gungahlin | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 26% of ACT | Higher than 89% of ACT |
| Schools | — | Higher than 100% of ACT |
| Walkability | Higher than 96% of ACT | Higher than 34% of ACT |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 28% of ACT | Higher than 37% of ACT |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 93% of ACT | Higher than 90% of ACT |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 46% of ACT | Higher than 66% of ACT |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 76% of ACT | — |
Liveability
Gungahlin is more walkable (86 vs 50); Nicholls scores higher overall (52 vs 39).
| Gungahlin | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | B |
| Score | 39/100 | 52/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
Gungahlin carries more crime risk (84 vs 43); Nicholls carries more flood risk (55 vs 42).
| Gungahlin | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 90/100 | High 88/100 |
| Crime | High 84/100 | Moderate 43/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 42/100 | Moderate 55/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Gungahlin | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 | 3 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 2 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 2 UC - Canberra, Bruce, 7.7 km | 2 UC - Canberra, Bruce, 6.5 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 3.1% | 3.5% |
Schools in Gungahlin
- Burgmann Anglican School Independent · Combined
- Gungahlin College Government · Secondary
Schools in Nicholls
- Holy Spirit Primary School Catholic · Primary above peers
- St John Paul II College Catholic · Secondary above peers
- Gold Creek School Government · Combined
Amenities in the suburb
| Gungahlin | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 2 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 28 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 2 |
| Childcare | 11 | 8 |
| GPs | 9 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 3 | 1 |
| Police stations | 2 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 7 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 2 same for both | |
| EV chargers | 3 | 2 |
| Waterways | 0 | 2 |
Mobility
| Gungahlin | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 86/100 | 50/100 |
| Distance to Canberra | 13.5 km | 15.4 km +14% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 20 min | 30 min |
| Public transport score | 94/100 Tram · Bus | 78/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 200.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 99.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.5% postcode 2912 | 2.7% postcode 2913 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 19 postcode 2912 | 47 postcode 2913 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (75.5%).
Setting
| Gungahlin | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 627 m above sea level, at the suburb centre same for both | |
NBN connectivity
| Gungahlin | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 100/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 100% 3,690 premises | 100% 2,517 premises |
Climate
| Gungahlin | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 622 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 0.8°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Gungahlin | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.6 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 11.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.41 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Gungahlin | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $3,105/yr same for both | |
| Council | Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Gungahlin | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Fenner same for both | |
| Member | Andrew Leigh same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Gungahlin | Nicholls | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | Not offered same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | None same for both | |
Tags
Nicholls
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Gungahlin
Other comparisons with Nicholls
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.