Gunderman vs Lower Macdonald
In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Gunderman: a median of $784,000, against $640,000 in Lower Macdonald, though rent is higher in Lower Macdonald. On these figures, Gunderman tends to suit people living alone, while Lower Macdonald suits buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Lower Macdonald
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (58/100 vs 81/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (39% vs 28%)
- But Gunderman has more parks and reserves (3 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Lower Macdonald
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($640,000 vs $784,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Gunderman
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($250/wk vs $310/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Lower Macdonald
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (14/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Lower Macdonald
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (14/100 vs 0/100)
- carries lower crime risk (58/100 vs 81/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Gunderman and Lower Macdonald drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Lower Macdonald has more residents (244 vs 189); Lower Macdonald rents higher ($310/wk vs $250/wk).
| Gunderman | Lower Macdonald | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 189 | 244 +29% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -3.1% | -6.2% |
| Median age | 54 | 53 |
| Median household income | $55,224/yr | $66,456/yr +20% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $250/wk | $310/wk +24% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.2%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.9%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Gunderman | Lower Macdonald | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $784,000 | $640,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $165,000 |
Zoning mix
| Gunderman | Lower Macdonald | |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | 99% | 97% |
| Rural and farming | 0% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Gunderman | Lower Macdonald | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,441 across Central Coast (NSW) | 459 across Hawkesbury |
| Approvals change year on year | +67% | +3% |
Ranking within NSW
| Gunderman | Lower Macdonald | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 27% of NSW | Higher than 23% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 15% of NSW | Higher than 29% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 20% of NSW | Higher than 63% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 44% of NSW | Higher than 67% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 56% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 29% of NSW | Higher than 32% of NSW |
Liveability
Lower Macdonald is more walkable (14 vs 0).
| Gunderman | Lower Macdonald | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 2/10 | below-average income decile 3/10 |
Risk profile
Gunderman carries more crime risk (81 vs 58).
| Gunderman | Lower Macdonald | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 85/100 | High 94/100 |
| Crime | High 81/100 | Moderate 58/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Gunderman | Lower Macdonald | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Gunderman | Lower Macdonald | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 0 |
| Waterways | 7 | 0 |
Mobility
| Gunderman | Lower Macdonald | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 14/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 82.7 km +1% vs other | 81.7 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 115 min | 112 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 2775 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 36 postcode 2775 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (66.7%).
Setting
| Gunderman | Lower Macdonald | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 163 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 19 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 23.8 km | 32.3 km |
NBN connectivity
| Gunderman | Lower Macdonald | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 20/100 | 22/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 93 premises | 0% 150 premises |
Climate
| Gunderman | Lower Macdonald | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 806 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Gunderman | Lower Macdonald | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,409/yr | $1,650/yr |
| Council | Central Coast (NSW) | Hawkesbury |
Federal electorate
| Gunderman | Lower Macdonald | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Robertson | Macquarie |
| Member | Gordon Reid | Susan Templeman |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Gunderman | Lower Macdonald | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Gunderman
Lower Macdonald
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Gunderman
Other comparisons with Lower Macdonald
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.