Gumma vs Way Way
Gumma is the younger of the two, with a median age of 52 against 55 in Way Way. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Gumma, about half of households are couple families. In Way Way, about half of households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Way Way: a median of $1.05 million, against $880,000 in Gumma, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Gumma tends to suit buyers on a tighter budget, while Way Way suits people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Gumma
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (41/100 vs 72/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Gumma has cheaper houses ($880,000 vs $1,050,000)
- Way Way leaves households under less mortgage stress (21% vs 31%)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Gumma
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($315/wk vs $360/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Gumma has a shorter drive in (317 min vs 322 min)
- Way Way sits closer to the CBD (473 km vs 478.6 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Gumma
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (41/100 vs 72/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (30% vs 25%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Gumma and Way Way drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Gumma has more residents (486 vs 265); Way Way rents higher ($360/wk vs $315/wk).
| Gumma | Way Way | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 486 +45% vs other | 265 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +6.1% | +10.9% |
| Median age | 52 | 55 |
| Median household income | $62,608/yr | $71,500/yr +14% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $315/wk | $360/wk +14% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (25.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.3%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Gumma | Way Way | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $880,000 | $1,050,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $770,000 |
Zoning mix
Way Way has more rural and farming land (62% vs 51%).
| Gumma | Way Way | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 51% | 62% |
| Environmental | 35% | 34% |
| Residential | 13% | 4% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Gumma | Way Way | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 109 across Nambucca Valley same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -64% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Gumma | Way Way | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 57% of NSW | Higher than 54% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 25% of NSW | Higher than 36% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 45% of NSW | Higher than 7% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 24% of NSW | Higher than 36% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 33% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 45% of NSW | Higher than 41% of NSW |
Liveability
| Gumma | Way Way | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 |
Risk profile
Way Way carries more crime risk (72 vs 41); Way Way carries more bushfire risk (60 vs 36).
| Gumma | Way Way | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 36/100 | Moderate 60/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 41/100 | High 72/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | Moderate 64/100 | Low 15/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Gumma | Way Way | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Gumma | Way Way | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 2 |
| Waterways | 1 | 12 |
Mobility
Gumma sits further from the CBD (478.6 km vs 473 km).
| Gumma | Way Way | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 4/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 478.6 km +1% vs other | 473 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 317 min | 322 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 2447 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 62 postcode 2447 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.8%).
Setting
| Gumma | Way Way | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 3 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 156 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 2.2 km 4.3 km to a named beach | 5.5 km |
NBN connectivity
| Gumma | Way Way | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 29/100 | 28/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 205 premises | 0% 106 premises |
Council rates
| Gumma | Way Way | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,175/yr same for both | |
| Council | Nambucca Valley same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Gumma | Way Way | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Cowper same for both | |
| Member | Pat Conaghan same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Gumma | Way Way | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Gumma
Other comparisons with Way Way
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.