Gumma vs North Macksville
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Gumma, about half of households are couple families. In North Macksville, about half of households are people living alone. On these figures, Gumma tends to suit couples, while North Macksville suits people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Gumma
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (41/100 vs 80/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (60% vs 50%)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (96% vs 80%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Gumma
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (31% vs 38%)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Gumma leaves renters under less rental stress (26% vs 37%)
- North Macksville has a bigger rental market to choose from (18% vs 8%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
North Macksville
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (21/100 vs 4/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
North Macksville
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (21/100 vs 4/100)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (20% vs 4%)
- But Gumma carries lower crime risk (41/100 vs 80/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
North Macksville
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (11.9% vs 6.1%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Gumma and North Macksville drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
North Macksville has more residents (669 vs 486); Gumma has higher household incomes ($62,608 vs $47,632).
| Gumma | North Macksville | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 486 | 669 +38% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +6.1% | +11.9% |
| Median age | 52 | 53 |
| Median household income | $62,608/yr +24% vs other | $47,632/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $315/wk | $340/wk +8% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.2%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.3%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Gumma | North Macksville | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $880,000 | $818,158 |
| Median unit price | — | $265,000 |
| Median land price | — | $1,075,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 68 days from 3 sales |
Zoning mix
| Gumma | North Macksville | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 51% | 48% |
| Environmental | 35% | 27% |
| Residential | 13% | 21% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 0% | 3% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Gumma | North Macksville | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 109 across Nambucca Valley same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -64% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Gumma | North Macksville | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 57% of NSW | Higher than 41% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 25% of NSW | Higher than 9% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 45% of NSW | Higher than 70% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 24% of NSW | Higher than 20% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 33% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 45% of NSW | Higher than 68% of NSW |
Liveability
North Macksville is more walkable (21 vs 4).
| Gumma | North Macksville | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | D |
| Score | — | 20/100 |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
North Macksville carries more crime risk (80 vs 41).
| Gumma | North Macksville | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 36/100 | Moderate 45/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 41/100 | High 80/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | Moderate 64/100 | None 0/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Gumma | North Macksville | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Gumma | North Macksville | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 2 |
| Hospitals | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 1 | 14 |
Mobility
| Gumma | North Macksville | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 4/100 | 21/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 478.6 km | 477 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 317 min | 315 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 2447 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 62 postcode 2447 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.8%).
Setting
| Gumma | North Macksville | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 3 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 21 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 2.2 km 4.3 km to a named beach | 4.7 km |
NBN connectivity
| Gumma | North Macksville | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 29/100 | 55/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 205 premises | 25% 388 premises |
Council rates
| Gumma | North Macksville | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,175/yr same for both | |
| Council | Nambucca Valley same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Gumma | North Macksville | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Cowper same for both | |
| Member | Pat Conaghan same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Gumma | North Macksville | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Gumma
Other comparisons with North Macksville
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.