Gumma vs Macksville

Macksville is the younger of the two, with a median age of 47 against 52 in Gumma. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Gumma, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Gumma: a median of $880,000, against $635,000 in Macksville. On these figures, Gumma tends to suit couples, while Macksville suits buyers on a tighter budget.

Which one suits you?

There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.

Families with school-age kids

Macksville

ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here

  • has more childcare (4 vs 0)
  • has more schools inside the suburb (3 vs 0)
  • has more parks and reserves (4 vs 1)
  • But Gumma carries lower crime risk (41/100 vs 88/100)

Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.

First-home buyers

Macksville

ahead on the one thing that separates them

  • has cheaper houses ($635,000 vs $880,000)

Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.

Renters

They split

one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here

  • Gumma leaves renters under less rental stress (26% vs 34%)
  • Macksville has a bigger rental market to choose from (30% vs 8%)

Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.

Commuting to the city

Macksville

ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here

  • is more walkable (26/100 vs 4/100)
  • has a shorter drive in (309 min vs 317 min)
  • sits closer to the CBD (471.6 km vs 478.6 km)

Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.

Downsizers and retirees

Macksville

ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here

  • is more walkable (26/100 vs 4/100)
  • has more GPs (5 vs 0)
  • But Gumma carries lower crime risk (41/100 vs 88/100)

Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.

Investors

Too close to call

Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.

Weighs population growth.

Where they sit

Gumma and Macksville drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.

Gumma Macksville
Hides rows where both suburbs match

Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.

Side by side, out of 100

Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.

Gumma Macksville
Walkability 4 / 26
Gumma — Walkability: 4/100 Macksville — Walkability: 26/100
Safety 59 / 12
Gumma — Safety: 59/100 Macksville — Safety: 12/100
Low fire risk 64 / 84
Gumma — Low fire risk: 64/100 Macksville — Low fire risk: 84/100

Demographics

Macksville has more residents (2,782 vs 486); Gumma has higher household incomes ($62,608 vs $49,088).

Gumma Macksville
Population 486 2,782
+472% vs other
Population trend (2016 → 2021) +6.1% +7.1%
Median age 52 47
Median household income $62,608/yr
+22% vs other
 $49,088/yr
Median weekly rent $315/wk $320/wk
+2% vs other

Age profile

Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.

Gumma Macksville
0-4 4.7% / 6.3%
Gumma — 0-4: 4.7% Macksville — 0-4: 6.3%
5-14 11.5% / 11.8%
Gumma — 5-14: 11.5% Macksville — 5-14: 11.8%
15-19 4.3% / 5.6%
Gumma — 15-19: 4.3% Macksville — 15-19: 5.6%
20-24 3.1% / 4.0%
Gumma — 20-24: 3.1% Macksville — 20-24: 4.0%
25-34 7.6% / 11.0%
Gumma — 25-34: 7.6% Macksville — 25-34: 11.0%
35-44 10.9% / 9.0%
Gumma — 35-44: 10.9% Macksville — 35-44: 9.0%
45-54 13.2% / 10.0%
Gumma — 45-54: 13.2% Macksville — 45-54: 10.0%
55-64 14.4% / 13.8%
Gumma — 55-64: 14.4% Macksville — 55-64: 13.8%
65-74 20.8% / 13.6%
Gumma — 65-74: 20.8% Macksville — 65-74: 13.6%
75-84 6.8% / 9.7%
Gumma — 75-84: 6.8% Macksville — 75-84: 9.7%
85+ 2.3% / 4.9%
Gumma — 85+: 2.3% Macksville — 85+: 4.9%

Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.8%).

Who lives together

Household composition, 2021 Census.

Gumma 36.1% lone person
Gumma — Lone Person: 36.1% Gumma — Couple Families: 48.7% Gumma — One Parent Families: 11.8% Gumma — Group Household: 3.4% Gumma — Other Families: 0.0%
Macksville 42.6% lone person
Macksville — Lone Person: 42.6% Macksville — Couple Families: 28.2% Macksville — One Parent Families: 22.9% Macksville — Group Household: 4.6% Macksville — Other Families: 1.7%
Lone Person Couple Families One Parent Families Group Household Other Families

Who owns and who rents

Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.

Gumma 7.7% renting
Gumma — Owned Outright: 56.6% Gumma — Mortgage: 35.7% Gumma — Renting: 7.7%
Macksville 30.3% renting
Macksville — Owned Outright: 43.6% Macksville — Mortgage: 26.1% Macksville — Renting: 30.3%
Owned outright Mortgage Renting

Qualifications

Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.

Gumma Macksville
Certificate III & IV 20.2% / 17.1%
Gumma — Certificate III & IV: 20.2% Macksville — Certificate III & IV: 17.1%
Advanced Diploma / Diploma 8.0% / 5.6%
Gumma — Advanced Diploma / Diploma: 8.0% Macksville — Advanced Diploma / Diploma: 5.6%
Bachelor Degree 7.2% / 5.8%
Gumma — Bachelor Degree: 7.2% Macksville — Bachelor Degree: 5.8%
Graduate Diploma / Certificate 2.7% / 0.9%
Gumma — Graduate Diploma / Certificate: 2.7% Macksville — Graduate Diploma / Certificate: 0.9%
Postgraduate Degree 1.0% / 0.9%
Gumma — Postgraduate Degree: 1.0% Macksville — Postgraduate Degree: 0.9%

Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.2%).

Where residents were born

Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.

Gumma Macksville
England 3.3% / 2.1%
Gumma — England: 3.3% Macksville — England: 2.1%
New Zealand 1.6% / 0.9%
Gumma — New Zealand: 1.6% Macksville — New Zealand: 0.9%
Malaysia 0.8% / 0.4%
Gumma — Malaysia: 0.8% Macksville — Malaysia: 0.4%
India — / 0.9%
Gumma — India: not among its largest Macksville — India: 0.9%
Netherlands 0.6% / —
Gumma — Netherlands: 0.6% Macksville — Netherlands: not among its largest
Germany — / 0.4%
Gumma — Germany: not among its largest Macksville — Germany: 0.4%

Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.3%).

What people live in

Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.

Gumma 95.8% houses
Gumma — Houses: 95.8% Gumma — Flats / Apartments: 4.2% Gumma — Townhouses: 0.0%
Macksville 90.8% houses
Macksville — Houses: 90.8% Macksville — Flats / Apartments: 3.6% Macksville — Townhouses: 5.6%
Houses Flats / Apartments Townhouses

Property market

Gumma Macksville
Median house price $880,000 $635,000
Median unit price —
same for both
Median land price — $605,000
Typical days to sell (houses) — 60 days
from 37 sales

Zoning mix

Gumma has more land zoned for conservation (35% vs 4%); Gumma has more rural and farming land (51% vs 40%).

Gumma Macksville
Rural and farming 51% 40%
Residential 13% 37%
Environmental 35% 4%
Parks and recreation 0% 8%
Industrial 0% 7%
Infrastructure and transport 0% 2%
Commercial 0% 1%
Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09.

Development activity

Gumma Macksville
New dwellings approved 109
across Nambucca Valley
same for both
Approvals change year on year -64%
same for both

Gross rental yield

Gross — before strata, rates, management, insurance and vacancy. From median advertised rents and median asking prices over the last 6 months. How we calculate.

Gumma Macksville
Houses — 3.8%
$600/wk on $820K
Units —
same for both

Ranking within NSW

Gumma Macksville
House price Higher than 57% of NSW Higher than 21% of NSW
Income Higher than 25% of NSW Higher than 10% of NSW
Schools — Higher than 64% of NSW
Walkability Higher than 45% of NSW Higher than 73% of NSW
Affordability Higher than 24% of NSW Higher than 46% of NSW
EV adoption Higher than 33% of NSW
same for both
NBN connectivity Higher than 45% of NSW Higher than 71% of NSW
Rental yield (houses) — Higher than 62% of NSW

Liveability

Macksville is more walkable (26 vs 4).

Gumma Macksville
Grade — C
Score — 34/100
Socio-economic band below-average income
decile 3/10
 high-need area
decile 1/10

Risk profile

Gumma carries more bushfire risk (36 vs 16); Macksville carries more crime risk (88 vs 41).

Gumma Macksville
Bushfire Low
36/100
 Low
16/100
Crime Moderate
41/100
 High
88/100
Flood Not mapped
no mapped data here
same for both
Coastal erosion Moderate
64/100
 None
0/100
Aircraft noise None
0/100
same for both
Industrial facilities nearby 0
within 5 km
 1
within 5 km

Schools

Gumma Macksville
Inside the suburb 0 3
Rated above peers 0 1
Rated at peers 0 1
Rated below peers 0 1

Schools in Gumma

No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.

Schools in Macksville

  • St Patrick's Primary School Catholic · Primary above peers
  • Macksville Public School Government · Primary at peers
  • Macksville High School Government · Secondary below peers

Amenities in the suburb

Gumma Macksville
Supermarkets 0 2
Cafes & restaurants 0 12
Parks & reserves 1 4
Childcare 0 4
GPs 0 5
Pharmacies 0 1
Police stations 0 1
Banks & Bank@Post 0 3
Fuel stations 0 3
EV chargers 0 2
Waterways 1
same for both

Mobility

Gumma sits further from the CBD (478.6 km vs 471.6 km).

Gumma Macksville
Walkability score 4/100 26/100
Distance to Sydney 478.6 km
+1% vs other
 471.6 km
Drive time (normal traffic) 317 min 309 min
Electric vehicle share 0.3%
postcode 2447
same for both
Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings 62
postcode 2447
same for both

How people get to work

Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.

Gumma Macksville
Car (driver) 78.8% / 79.3%
Gumma — Car (driver): 78.8% Macksville — Car (driver): 79.3%
Worked from Home 13.5% / 7.8%
Gumma — Worked from Home: 13.5% Macksville — Worked from Home: 7.8%
Car (passenger) 5.3% / 6.2%
Gumma — Car (passenger): 5.3% Macksville — Car (passenger): 6.2%
Walked Only 2.4% / 5.9%
Gumma — Walked Only: 2.4% Macksville — Walked Only: 5.9%
Bicycle — / 0.9%
Gumma — Bicycle: not among its largest Macksville — Bicycle: 0.9%

Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (79.3%).

Setting

Gumma Macksville
Elevation 3 m
above sea level, at the suburb centre
 6 m
above sea level, at the suburb centre
Distance to the ocean 2.2 km
4.3 km to a named beach
 6.8 km

NBN connectivity

Gumma Macksville
Connectivity score 29/100 62/100
Most common technology Fixed wireless Fibre to the premises
Full-fibre (FTTP) share 0%
205 premises
 34%
1,711 premises

Council rates

Gumma Macksville
Average residential rate $1,175/yr
same for both
Council Nambucca Valley
same for both

Federal electorate

Gumma Macksville
Division Cowper
same for both
Member Pat Conaghan
same for both
Party The Nationals
same for both

First Home Owner Grant

Gumma Macksville
Grant amount $10,000
same for both
Property price cap $600,000
same for both
Eligibility New
same for both

Tags

Gumma

Coastal Retirees Rural

Macksville

Acreage Affordable Retirees

More comparisons

Other comparisons with Gumma

Gumma vs Nambucca Heads Gumma vs Scotts Head Gumma vs North Macksville Gumma vs Way Way

Other comparisons with Macksville

Macksville vs North Macksville Macksville vs Congarinni North Macksville vs Congarinni Macksville vs Way Way Macksville vs Talarm
Full data on Gumma Full data on Macksville
Unlock full address-level data — $29/month

Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.

Save this page for later

We'll email you a link to this page so you can finish reading it on any device. We use your address once to send it and don't keep it.

or