Green Valley vs Cecil Hills
In both, most households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Cecil Hills: a median of $1.48 million, against $1.22 million in Green Valley, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Green Valley tends to suit buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Cecil Hills
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
- carries lower crime risk (36/100 vs 47/100)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (95% vs 82%)
- But Green Valley has more schools inside the suburb (4 vs 2)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Green Valley has cheaper houses ($1,222,500 vs $1,480,000)
- Cecil Hills leaves households under less mortgage stress (21% vs 26%)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Green Valley
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (29% vs 15%)
- has cheaper rent ($450/wk vs $550/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Green Valley
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (83/100 vs 68/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Green Valley
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more GPs (4 vs 1)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (18% vs 5%)
- is more walkable (83/100 vs 68/100)
- But Cecil Hills carries lower crime risk (36/100 vs 47/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Cecil Hills
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (4.3% vs 3.4%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Green Valley and Cecil Hills drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Green Valley has more residents (12,919 vs 6,906); Cecil Hills has higher household incomes ($125,268 vs $92,300).
| Green Valley | Cecil Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,919 +47% vs other | 6,906 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +3.2% | -1.6% |
| Median age | 37 | 38 |
| Median household income | $92,300/yr | $125,268/yr +36% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $450/wk | $550/wk +22% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (13.3%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (9.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Green Valley | Cecil Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,222,500 | $1,480,000 |
| Median unit price | $820,000 | — |
| Median land price | $1,525,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 23 days from 33 sales | 28 days from 26 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
34 vs 31 sales
13 vs 10 sales
Development activity
| Green Valley | Cecil Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 2,229 across Liverpool same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +28% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Green Valley | Cecil Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.4% $775/wk on $1.19M | 4.3% $1,000/wk on $1.2M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Green Valley | Cecil Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 59% of NSW | Higher than 73% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 59% of NSW | Higher than 87% of NSW |
| Schools | Higher than 8% of NSW | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 93% of NSW | Higher than 88% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 47% of NSW | Higher than 53% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 39% of NSW | Higher than 81% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 85% of NSW same for both | |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 39% of NSW | Higher than 87% of NSW |
Liveability
Green Valley is more walkable (83 vs 68); Cecil Hills scores higher overall (56 vs 49).
| Green Valley | Cecil Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 49/100 | 56/100 |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 2/10 | advantaged area decile 8/10 |
Risk profile
Cecil Hills carries more bushfire risk (56 vs 0); Green Valley carries more crime risk (47 vs 36).
| Green Valley | Cecil Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Moderate 56/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 47/100 | Low 36/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 3 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Green Valley | Cecil Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 4 | 2 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 3 | 0 |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 50 Scott Street Liverpool, 5.1 km | 1 50 Scott Street Liverpool, 8.0 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 3.8% | 4.5% |
Schools in Green Valley
- Green Valley Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Busby West Public School Government · Primary below peers
- James Busby High School Government · Secondary below peers
- Minarah College Independent · Combined below peers
Schools in Cecil Hills
- Cecil Hills High School Government · Secondary above peers
- Cecil Hills Public School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Green Valley | Cecil Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 2 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 12 | 13 |
| Childcare | 10 | 5 |
| GPs | 4 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 2 | 1 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 2 | 0 |
| Waterways | 1 | 14 |
Mobility
| Green Valley | Cecil Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 83/100 | 68/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 49.9 km +1% vs other | 49.4 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 46 min | 47 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 186.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 91.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 2168 | 1.1% postcode 2171 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 38 postcode 2168 | 57 postcode 2171 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (59.8%).
Setting
| Green Valley | Cecil Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 71 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 74 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 26.7 km | 29.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Green Valley | Cecil Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 76/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 11% 3,868 premises | 56% 2,064 premises |
Climate
| Green Valley | Cecil Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 931 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.9°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.9°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Green Valley | Cecil Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 18.2 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.72 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Green Valley | Cecil Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,322/yr same for both | |
| Council | Liverpool same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Green Valley | Cecil Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Werriwa same for both | |
| Member | Anne Maree Stanley same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Green Valley | Cecil Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Green Valley
Cecil Hills
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Green Valley
Other comparisons with Cecil Hills
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.