Green Pigeon vs Horseshoe Creek
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Horseshoe Creek, most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Green Pigeon: a median of $905,000, against $750,000 in Horseshoe Creek. On these figures, Green Pigeon tends to suit older residents, while Horseshoe Creek suits couples and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Too close to call
Nothing among the 6 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Horseshoe Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($750,000 vs $905,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Horseshoe Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves renters under less rental stress (17% vs 25%)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Horseshoe Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (754 km vs 760.7 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Green Pigeon
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more residents already 65 and over (23% vs 12%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Green Pigeon
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (13.5% vs -18.8%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Green Pigeon and Horseshoe Creek drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Green Pigeon has more residents (176 vs 69); Horseshoe Creek has higher household incomes ($71,500 vs $51,324).
| Green Pigeon | Horseshoe Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 176 +61% vs other | 69 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +13.5% | -18.8% |
| Median age | 51 | 49 |
| Median household income | $51,324/yr | $71,500/yr +39% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $250/wk +5% vs other | $238/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.6%).
Property market
| Green Pigeon | Horseshoe Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $905,000 | $750,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
Green Pigeon has more land zoned for conservation (21% vs 1%); Horseshoe Creek has more rural and farming land (99% vs 79%).
| Green Pigeon | Horseshoe Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 79% | 99% |
| Environmental | 21% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Green Pigeon | Horseshoe Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 25 across Kyogle same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +0% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Green Pigeon | Horseshoe Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 43% of NSW | Higher than 30% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 12% of NSW | Higher than 38% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 57% of NSW | Higher than 59% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 23% of NSW | Higher than 61% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 11% of NSW | Higher than 12% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 33% of NSW | Higher than 63% of NSW |
Liveability
| Green Pigeon | Horseshoe Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 2/10 | below-average income decile 3/10 |
Risk profile
Green Pigeon carries more bushfire risk (62 vs 0).
| Green Pigeon | Horseshoe Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 62/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Low 18/100 | Low 23/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Green Pigeon | Horseshoe Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Green Pigeon | Horseshoe Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 5 | 0 |
Mobility
Green Pigeon sits further from the CBD (760.7 km vs 754 km).
| Green Pigeon | Horseshoe Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 10/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Sydney | 760.7 km | 754 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 520 min | 516 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.1% postcode 2474 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 71 postcode 2474 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (68.8%).
Setting
| Green Pigeon | Horseshoe Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 203 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 78 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Green Pigeon | Horseshoe Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 23/100 | 30/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 73 premises | 0% 31 premises |
Climate
| Green Pigeon | Horseshoe Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,569 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 9.1°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Green Pigeon | Horseshoe Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,264/yr same for both | |
| Council | Kyogle same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Green Pigeon | Horseshoe Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Page same for both | |
| Member | Kevin Hogan same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Green Pigeon | Horseshoe Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Green Pigeon
Other comparisons with Horseshoe Creek
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.