Golden Point vs Mount Pleasant
Mount Pleasant is the younger of the two, with a median age of 35 against 40 in Golden Point. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Golden Point, about half of households are people living alone. On these figures, Golden Point tends to suit people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Golden Point
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more parks and reserves (7 vs 3)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Golden Point has cheaper units ($335,000 vs $445,000)
- Mount Pleasant has cheaper land ($210,000 vs $297,500)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Golden Point
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (68/100 vs 58/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Golden Point
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (68/100 vs 58/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Golden Point and Mount Pleasant drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Golden Point skews older (40 vs 35).
| Golden Point | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,217 | 2,225 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +5.2% | +1.0% |
| Median age | 40 | 35 |
| Median household income | $68,068/yr | $70,200/yr +3% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $290/wk +3% vs other | $280/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.5%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Golden Point | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $562,500 | $540,000 |
| Median unit price | $335,000 | $445,000 |
| Median land price | $297,500 | $210,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 55 days from 21 sales | 39 days from 13 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
15 vs 9 sales
57 vs 32 sales
13 vs 17 sales
Zoning mix
| Golden Point | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 67% | 78% |
| Other and special use | 16% | 0% |
| Parks and recreation | 11% | 9% |
| Rural and farming | 0% | 7% |
| Industrial | 1% | 5% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 5% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Golden Point | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,451 across Ballarat same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +42% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Golden Point | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.2% $440/wk on $550K | 3.9% $450/wk on $605K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Golden Point | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — | Higher than 12% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 29% of VIC | Higher than 32% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 89% of VIC | Higher than 87% of VIC |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 85% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 73% of VIC | Higher than 72% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 100% of VIC same for both | |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 77% of VIC | Higher than 59% of VIC |
Liveability
Mount Pleasant scores higher overall (51 vs 35); Golden Point is more walkable (68 vs 58).
| Golden Point | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | B |
| Score | 35/100 | 51/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | below-average income decile 3/10 |
Risk profile
Golden Point carries more flood risk (82 vs 0).
| Golden Point | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | High 91/100 | High 85/100 |
| Flood | High 82/100 | None 0/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 13 within 5 km | 12 within 5 km |
Schools
| Golden Point | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 Federation University Ballarat, 1.8 km | 1 Federation University Ballarat, 2.2 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 1.9% | 2.5% |
Schools in Golden Point
- Mount Clear College-G Place Campus Government · Secondary
- Sovereign Hill School Government · Secondary · Special school
Schools in Mount Pleasant
- Mount Pleasant Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Golden Point | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 6 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | 3 |
| Childcare | 1 | 2 |
| GPs | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 2 | 0 |
| EV chargers | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 15 | 1 |
Mobility
| Golden Point | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 114.9 km | 116.4 km +1% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 85 min | 87 min |
| Public transport score | 76/100 | 55/100 |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 42.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 13.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.9% postcode 3350 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 30 postcode 3350 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (68.7%).
Setting
| Golden Point | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 457 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 431 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Golden Point | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 100/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 100% 1,328 premises | 100% 1,186 premises |
Climate
| Golden Point | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 605 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 25.7°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 3.5°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Golden Point | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,086/yr same for both | |
| Council | Ballarat same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Golden Point | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Ballarat same for both | |
| Member | Catherine King same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Golden Point | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Golden Point
Mount Pleasant
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Golden Point
Other comparisons with Mount Pleasant
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.