Glenmore vs Rowsley
Glenmore is the younger of the two, with a median age of 37 against 41 in Rowsley. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Rowsley, the large majority of households are couple families. On these figures, Glenmore tends to suit people living alone, while Rowsley suits couples and older residents.
Glenmore is a much smaller, quieter community of 75 people compared to Rowsley's 231, and sits slightly further from Melbourne's CBD at 77.1 km versus 70.4 km. Glenmore offers notably higher median household income at $125,632 annually against Rowsley's $100,724, along with lower crime risk (19 versus 54) and flood risk (31 versus 42). Rowsley has a slightly older population (median age 41 versus 37) and higher socio-economic standing, but rental costs are substantially higher at $375 per week compared to Glenmore's $100. Glenmore suits those seeking a rural, quieter setting with stronger household incomes, while Rowsley appeals to buyers wanting more established community services and infrastructure.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Glenmore
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (20/100 vs 69/100)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (106% vs 92%)
- But Rowsley is already more of a family suburb (76% vs 56%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Glenmore
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (19% vs 28%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Glenmore
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (4% vs 19%)
- has cheaper rent ($100/wk vs $375/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Rowsley
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (62 min vs 69 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (70.4 km vs 77.1 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Glenmore carries lower crime risk (20/100 vs 69/100)
- Rowsley has more residents already 65 and over (22% vs 5%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Glenmore and Rowsley drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Rowsley rents higher ($375/wk vs $100/wk); Rowsley has more residents (231 vs 75).
| Glenmore | Rowsley | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 75 | 231 +208% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +19.0% | +20.3% |
| Median age | 37 | 41 |
| Median household income | $125,632/yr +20% vs other | $100,724/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $100/wk | $375/wk +275% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.5%).
Zoning mix
Rowsley has more rural and farming land (89% vs 76%).
| Glenmore | Rowsley | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 76% | 89% |
| Parks and recreation | 23% | 1% |
| Other and special use | 0% | 7% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 1% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Glenmore | Rowsley | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 338 across Moorabool same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +4% same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Glenmore | Rowsley | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 93% of VIC | Higher than 73% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 35% of VIC | Higher than 28% of VIC |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 65% of VIC same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 13% of VIC | Higher than 24% of VIC |
Liveability
| Glenmore | Rowsley | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
Rowsley carries more crime risk (69 vs 20); Rowsley carries more flood risk (42 vs 32).
| Glenmore | Rowsley | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 32/100 | Low 36/100 |
| Crime | Low 20/100 | Moderate 69/100 |
| Flood | Low 32/100 | Moderate 42/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Glenmore | Rowsley | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Glenmore | Rowsley | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 2 | 9 |
Mobility
Glenmore sits further from the CBD (77.1 km vs 70.4 km).
| Glenmore | Rowsley | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Melbourne | 77.1 km +9% vs other | 70.4 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 69 min | 62 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.7% postcode 3340 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 42 postcode 3340 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (72.4%).
Setting
| Glenmore | Rowsley | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 264 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 187 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 39.8 km | 36.8 km |
NBN connectivity
| Glenmore | Rowsley | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 16/100 | 24/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 15 premises | 0% 73 premises |
Climate
| Glenmore | Rowsley | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 578 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Glenmore | Rowsley | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 4.4 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | — same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Glenmore | Rowsley | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,979/yr same for both | |
| Council | Moorabool same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Glenmore | Rowsley | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Hawke same for both | |
| Member | Sam Rae same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Glenmore | Rowsley | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Glenmore
Rowsley
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Glenmore
Other comparisons with Rowsley
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.