Glenfyne vs Scotts Creek
Glenfyne is the younger of the two, with a median age of 41 against 51 in Scotts Creek. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. On these figures, Glenfyne tends to suit families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Scotts Creek
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (39/100 vs 74/100)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (103% vs 90%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Scotts Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (12% vs 21%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Glenfyne
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (6% vs 16%)
- has cheaper rent ($125/wk vs $260/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Scotts Creek
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (155 min vs 163 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (205.9 km vs 212.3 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Scotts Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (39/100 vs 74/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Glenfyne
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (-3.0% vs -13.7%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Glenfyne and Scotts Creek drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Scotts Creek rents higher ($260/wk vs $125/wk); Scotts Creek has more residents (214 vs 131).
| Glenfyne | Scotts Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 131 | 214 +63% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -3.0% | -13.7% |
| Median age | 41 | 51 |
| Median household income | $100,724/yr +17% vs other | $83,200/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $125/wk | $260/wk +108% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.7%).
Zoning mix
| Glenfyne | Scotts Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 99% same for both | |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Glenfyne | Scotts Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 60 across Corangamite same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +117% same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Glenfyne | Scotts Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 73% of VIC | Higher than 51% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 51% of VIC | Higher than 12% of VIC |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 15% of VIC | — |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 37% of VIC | Higher than 27% of VIC |
Liveability
| Glenfyne | Scotts Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
Glenfyne carries more crime risk (74 vs 39); Scotts Creek carries more bushfire risk (88 vs 61).
| Glenfyne | Scotts Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 61/100 | High 88/100 |
| Crime | High 74/100 | Low 39/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Glenfyne | Scotts Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Glenfyne | Scotts Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 4 | 12 |
Mobility
Glenfyne sits further from the CBD (212.3 km vs 205.9 km).
| Glenfyne | Scotts Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Melbourne | 212.3 km +3% vs other | 205.9 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 163 min | 155 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.2% postcode 3266 | 0.0% postcode 3267 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 37 postcode 3266 | — |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (58.4%).
Setting
| Glenfyne | Scotts Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 118 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 43 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 23.5 km | 19.1 km |
NBN connectivity
| Glenfyne | Scotts Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 28/100 | 26/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 58 premises | 0% 91 premises |
Climate
| Glenfyne | Scotts Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 717 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Glenfyne | Scotts Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,335/yr same for both | |
| Council | Corangamite same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Glenfyne | Scotts Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Wannon same for both | |
| Member | Dan Tehan same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Glenfyne | Scotts Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Glenfyne
Other comparisons with Scotts Creek
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.