Glenfield vs Casula
Comparing Glenfield and Casula, NSW: Casula has more residents (16,584 vs 10,536); Glenfield carries more crime risk (83 vs 67); and Casula is more walkable (88 vs 72).
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Casula
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (14 vs 6)
- has more parks and reserves (22 vs 13)
- carries lower crime risk (67/100 vs 83/100)
- But Glenfield has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Glenfield
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves renters under less rental stress (20% vs 26%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Casula
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (88/100 vs 72/100)
- has a shorter drive in (38 min vs 43 min)
- But Glenfield gets more of its commuters onto trains and trams (11% vs 3%)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Casula
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more GPs (6 vs 1)
- carries lower crime risk (67/100 vs 83/100)
- is more walkable (88/100 vs 72/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Glenfield and Casula drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Casula has more residents (16,584 vs 10,536); Glenfield has higher household incomes ($107,640 vs $89,960).
| Glenfield | Casula | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,536 | 16,584 +57% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +9.4% | +5.9% |
| Median age | 36 same for both | |
| Median household income | $107,640/yr +16% vs other | $89,960/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $420/wk | $450/wk +7% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.3%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (9.3%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Glenfield | Casula | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,157,500 | $1,250,000 |
| Median unit price | $695,000 | $760,000 |
| Median land price | — | $1,075,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 22 days from 60 sales | 24 days from 124 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
48 vs 58 sales
25 vs 81 sales
8 vs 26 sales
Zoning mix
| Glenfield | Casula | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 41% | 55% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 27% | 12% |
| Parks and recreation | 18% | 15% |
| Industrial | 6% | 9% |
| Environmental | 7% same for both | |
| Commercial | 0% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Glenfield | Casula | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,788 across Campbelltown (NSW) | 2,229 across Liverpool |
| Approvals change year on year | +48% | +28% |
Gross rental yield
| Glenfield | Casula | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.9% $720/wk on $962K | 3.5% $780/wk on $1.16M |
| Units | — | 4.7% $600/wk on $659K |
Ranking within NSW
| Glenfield | Casula | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 59% of NSW | Higher than 62% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 74% of NSW | Higher than 58% of NSW |
| Schools | Higher than 39% of NSW | Higher than 9% of NSW |
| Walkability | Higher than 89% of NSW | Higher than 95% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 61% of NSW | Higher than 43% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 91% of NSW | Higher than 72% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 89% of NSW | Higher than 85% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 67% of NSW | Higher than 44% of NSW |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 54% of NSW |
Liveability
Casula is more walkable (88 vs 72); Glenfield scores higher overall (42 vs 36).
| Glenfield | Casula | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C same for both | |
| Score | 42/100 | 36/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 |
Risk profile
Glenfield carries more crime risk (83 vs 67).
| Glenfield | Casula | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 83/100 | High 76/100 |
| Crime | High 83/100 | Moderate 67/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 6 within 5 km | 8 within 5 km |
Schools
| Glenfield | Casula | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 6 | 3 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 2 | 1 |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 50 Scott Street Liverpool, 5.7 km | 1 50 Scott Street Liverpool, 3.6 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.8% | 3.1% |
Schools in Glenfield
- Hurlstone Agricultural High School Government · Secondary above peers
- Glenwood Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Glenfield Public School Government · Primary below peers
- Campbell House School Government · Secondary · Special school below peers
- Ajuga School Government · Combined · Special school
- Glenfield Park School Government · Combined · Special school
Schools in Casula
- Casula Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Casula High School Government · Secondary below peers
- All Saints Catholic College, Casula Campus Catholic · Secondary
Amenities in the suburb
| Glenfield | Casula | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 3 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 9 |
| Parks & reserves | 13 | 22 |
| Childcare | 6 | 14 |
| GPs | 1 | 6 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 3 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 2 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 8 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 1 | 7 |
Mobility
| Glenfield | Casula | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 72/100 | 88/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 41.7 km +2% vs other | 40.7 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 43 min | 38 min |
| Public transport score | 95/100 Rail · Bus | 91/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 179.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 377.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.7% postcode 2167 | 0.8% postcode 2170 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 46 postcode 2167 | 32 postcode 2170 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (54.3%).
Setting
| Glenfield | Casula | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 28 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 48 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 21.9 km 3.5 km to a named beach | 22.0 km |
NBN connectivity
| Glenfield | Casula | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 80/100 | 76/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 23% 3,285 premises | 11% 5,904 premises |
Climate
| Glenfield | Casula | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 909 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.7°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.4°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Glenfield | Casula | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 18.2 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.72 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Glenfield | Casula | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,443/yr | $1,322/yr |
| Council | Campbelltown (NSW) | Liverpool |
Federal electorate
| Glenfield | Casula | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Hughes | Werriwa |
| Member | David Moncrieff | Anne Maree Stanley |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Glenfield | Casula | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Glenfield
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Glenfield
Other comparisons with Casula
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.