Glendenning vs Oakhurst
Comparing Glendenning and Oakhurst, NSW: Glendenning carries more bushfire risk (28 vs 0); Oakhurst is more walkable (79 vs 57); and Oakhurst has more residents (6,947 vs 5,196).
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Oakhurst
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (8 vs 5)
- carries lower crime risk (45/100 vs 57/100)
- But Glendenning has more childcare (7 vs 2)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Glendenning sits closer to the CBD (42.9 km vs 46.8 km)
- Oakhurst is more walkable (79/100 vs 57/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Oakhurst
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (79/100 vs 57/100)
- carries lower crime risk (45/100 vs 57/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Glendenning and Oakhurst drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Oakhurst has more residents (6,947 vs 5,196).
| Glendenning | Oakhurst | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,196 | 6,947 +34% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +1.3% | -0.1% |
| Median age | 33 | 34 |
| Median household income | $114,556/yr +5% vs other | $109,044/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $430/wk +3% vs other | $418/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (13.2%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (14.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Glendenning | Oakhurst | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,082,500 | $1,037,500 |
| Median unit price | $1,675,000 | — |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 28 days from 32 sales | 26 days from 48 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
32 vs 59 sales
19 vs 29 sales
7 vs 10 sales
Zoning mix
Glendenning has more industrially zoned land (39% vs 0%).
| Glendenning | Oakhurst | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 27% | 72% |
| Industrial | 39% | 0% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 11% | 14% |
| Parks and recreation | 4% | 10% |
| Environmental | 0% | 4% |
| Planning zones cover 82% of Glendenning and 100% of Oakhurst. The rest is unzoned land such as water or road reserve. | ||
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Glendenning | Oakhurst | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 2,325 across Blacktown same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -18% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Glendenning | Oakhurst | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.9% $720/wk on $955K | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Glendenning | Oakhurst | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 52% of NSW | Higher than 49% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 79% of NSW | Higher than 74% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 84% of NSW | Higher than 92% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 73% of NSW | Higher than 72% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 76% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 89% of NSW | Higher than 90% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 69% of NSW | — |
Liveability
Oakhurst is more walkable (79 vs 57); Oakhurst scores higher overall (65 vs 51).
| Glendenning | Oakhurst | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 51/100 | 65/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Glendenning carries more bushfire risk (28 vs 0); Glendenning carries more crime risk (57 vs 45).
| Glendenning | Oakhurst | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 28/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 57/100 | Moderate 45/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 5 within 5 km | 6 within 5 km |
Schools
| Glendenning | Oakhurst | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
Schools in Glendenning
- St Francis of Assisi Primary School Catholic · Primary at peers
- Glendenning Public School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Oakhurst
- Richard Johnson Anglican College Independent · Combined at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Glendenning | Oakhurst | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 8 |
| Childcare | 7 | 2 |
| GPs | 1 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
Oakhurst sits further from the CBD (46.8 km vs 42.9 km).
| Glendenning | Oakhurst | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 57/100 | 79/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 42.9 km | 46.8 km +9% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 40 min | 42 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 102.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 125.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.9% postcode 2761 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 64 postcode 2761 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (59.4%).
Setting
| Glendenning | Oakhurst | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 36 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 41 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 36.4 km | 38.2 km |
NBN connectivity
| Glendenning | Oakhurst | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 80/100 | 81/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 18% 1,956 premises | 20% 2,113 premises |
Climate
| Glendenning | Oakhurst | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 932 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Glendenning | Oakhurst | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.7 µg/m³ | 6.1 µg/m³ |
| PM10 | 17.6 µg/m³ | 15.5 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | 0.88 pphm | 0.53 pphm |
Council rates
| Glendenning | Oakhurst | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,157/yr same for both | |
| Council | Blacktown same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Glendenning | Oakhurst | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Chifley same for both | |
| Member | Ed Husic same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Glendenning | Oakhurst | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Glendenning
Oakhurst
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Glendenning
Other comparisons with Oakhurst
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.