Glendalough vs Osborne Park
In both, most households rent. In Glendalough, most homes are flats or apartments and about half of households are people living alone. In Osborne Park, most households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Osborne Park: a median of $940,000, against $841,000 in Glendalough. Glendalough is closer to the city centre: 6.1 km, against 8 km. On these figures, Osborne Park tends to suit people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Glendalough has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
- Osborne Park has more childcare (7 vs 2)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Glendalough
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($841,000 vs $940,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Glendalough
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- gets more of its commuters onto trains and trams (15% vs 6%)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Glendalough
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (75/100 vs 86/100)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (92% vs 82%)
- But Osborne Park has more GPs (6 vs 1)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house yield, unit yield, and population growth.
Where they sit
Glendalough and Osborne Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Osborne Park has more residents (4,463 vs 2,628).
| Glendalough | Osborne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,628 | 4,463 +70% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +5.8% | +8.3% |
| Median age | 34 same for both | |
| Median household income | $81,224/yr +5% vs other | $76,856/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $280/wk | $290/wk +4% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (30.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.1%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (11.9%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Glendalough | Osborne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $841,000 | $940,000 |
| Median unit price | $460,000 | $493,100 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 28 days from 6 sales | 23 days from 23 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
11 vs 11 sales
11 vs 25 sales
Development activity
| Glendalough | Osborne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,557 across Stirling same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +23% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Glendalough | Osborne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.7% $762/wk on $848K | 4.7% $725/wk on $800K |
| Units | 6.8% $650/wk on $500K | 7.2% $625/wk on $449K |
Ranking within WA
| Glendalough | Osborne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 43% of WA | Higher than 39% of WA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 93% of WA | Higher than 90% of WA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 97% of WA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 80% of WA | Higher than 79% of WA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 70% of WA | Higher than 72% of WA |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 91% of WA | Higher than 94% of WA |
Liveability
| Glendalough | Osborne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 67/100 | 66/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 |
Risk profile
Osborne Park carries more crime risk (86 vs 75).
| Glendalough | Osborne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | High 75/100 | High 86/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 9 within 5 km | 6 within 5 km |
Schools
| Glendalough | Osborne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 ECU City Campus, 5.3 km | 3 ECU City Campus, 6.7 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.5% | 2.0% |
Schools in Glendalough
- Chrysalis Montessori School Independent · Primary above peers
Schools in Osborne Park
- Osborne Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Glendalough | Osborne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 3 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 9 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 1 |
| Childcare | 2 | 7 |
| GPs | 1 | 6 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 2 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 4 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 4 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 7 |
Mobility
| Glendalough | Osborne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 77/100 | 71/100 |
| Distance to Perth | 6.1 km | 8 km +31% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 10 min | 11 min |
| Public transport score | 94/100 Bus | 94/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 53.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 378.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.6% postcode 6016 | 2.4% postcode 6017 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 34 postcode 6016 | 28 postcode 6017 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (74.6%).
Setting
| Glendalough | Osborne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 8 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 26 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 6.1 km | 5.8 km |
NBN connectivity
| Glendalough | Osborne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 67/100 | 66/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 24% 1,613 premises | 19% 5,581 premises |
Climate
| Glendalough | Osborne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 650 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Glendalough | Osborne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,615/yr same for both | |
| Council | Stirling same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Glendalough | Osborne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Curtin same for both | |
| Member | Kate Chaney same for both | |
| Party | Independent same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Glendalough | Osborne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $800,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Glendalough
Osborne Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Glendalough
Other comparisons with Osborne Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.