Glen Osmond vs Mount Osmond
Glen Osmond is the younger of the two, with a median age of 42 against 46 in Mount Osmond. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Glen Osmond: a median of $1.71 million, against $1.37 million in Mount Osmond. Glen Osmond is closer to the city centre: 7 km, against 10.6 km. On these figures, Mount Osmond tends to suit buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Glen Osmond has more parks and reserves (6 vs 1)
- Mount Osmond carries lower crime risk (33/100 vs 66/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Mount Osmond
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($1,366,000 vs $1,707,500)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Glen Osmond
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (58/100 vs 36/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (7 km vs 10.6 km)
- has a shorter drive in (13 min vs 18 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Glen Osmond is more walkable (58/100 vs 36/100)
- Mount Osmond carries lower crime risk (33/100 vs 66/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Mount Osmond
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (22.8% vs 8.2%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Glen Osmond and Mount Osmond drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Glen Osmond has more residents (2,154 vs 464); Mount Osmond skews older (46 vs 42).
| Glen Osmond | Mount Osmond | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,154 +78% vs other | 464 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +8.2% | +22.8% |
| Median age | 42 | 46 |
| Median household income | $132,288/yr | $144,404/yr +9% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $430/wk | $441/wk +3% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (26.1%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.3%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Glen Osmond | Mount Osmond | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,707,500 | $1,366,000 |
| Median unit price | $910,750 | — |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 27 days from 20 sales | — |
Zoning mix
Mount Osmond has more land zoned for conservation (100% vs 5%).
| Glen Osmond | Mount Osmond | |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | 5% | 100% |
| Residential | 82% | 0% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 9% | 0% |
| Commercial | 3% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Glen Osmond | Mount Osmond | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 250 across Burnside same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +32% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Glen Osmond | Mount Osmond | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 2.8% $870/wk on $1.61M | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Glen Osmond | Mount Osmond | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 91% of SA | Higher than 92% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 95% of SA | Higher than 98% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 83% of SA | Higher than 77% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 33% of SA | Higher than 39% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 100% of SA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 93% of SA | Higher than 94% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 11% of SA | — |
Liveability
Glen Osmond is more walkable (58 vs 36).
| Glen Osmond | Mount Osmond | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | — |
| Score | 52/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Glen Osmond carries more crime risk (66 vs 33).
| Glen Osmond | Mount Osmond | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 87/100 | High 84/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 66/100 | Low 33/100 |
| Flood | — same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Glen Osmond | Mount Osmond | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Adelaide University, Adelaide City Campus, 5.6 km | 3 Adelaide University, Magill Campus, 6.3 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 3.9% | 3.0% |
Schools in Glen Osmond
- Seymour College Independent · Combined above peers
Schools in Mount Osmond
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Glen Osmond | Mount Osmond | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 2 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 1 |
| Childcare | 2 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
Mount Osmond sits further from the CBD (10.6 km vs 7 km).
| Glen Osmond | Mount Osmond | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 58/100 | 36/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 7 km | 10.6 km +51% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 13 min | 18 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus | 45/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 63.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 12.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 4 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.9% postcode 5064 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 63 postcode 5064 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (66.8%).
Setting
| Glen Osmond | Mount Osmond | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 172 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 370 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 12.6 km | 13.5 km |
NBN connectivity
| Glen Osmond | Mount Osmond | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 81/100 | 84/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 41% 973 premises | 52% 173 premises |
Climate
| Glen Osmond | Mount Osmond | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 969 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 23.8°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 5.4°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Glen Osmond | Mount Osmond | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 1.12 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Glen Osmond | Mount Osmond | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,410/yr same for both | |
| Council | Burnside same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Glen Osmond | Mount Osmond | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Sturt same for both | |
| Member | Claire Clutterham same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Glen Osmond | Mount Osmond | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Glen Osmond
Mount Osmond
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Glen Osmond
Other comparisons with Mount Osmond
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.