Glen Creek vs Yackandandah
Glen Creek is the younger of the two, with a median age of 47 against 50 in Yackandandah. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Glen Creek, most households are people living alone. In Yackandandah, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Glen Creek tends to suit young adults and people living alone, while Yackandandah suits families with children, couples, and older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Yackandandah
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (4 vs 0)
- has more childcare (3 vs 0)
- has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Yackandandah
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (22% vs 38%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Glen Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($210/wk vs $306/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Yackandandah
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (208 min vs 232 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (309.6 km vs 323.6 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Yackandandah
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more residents already 65 and over (26% vs 7%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Glen Creek and Yackandandah drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Yackandandah has more residents (2,008 vs 59); Yackandandah rents higher ($306/wk vs $210/wk).
| Glen Creek | Yackandandah | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 59 | 2,008 +3303% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +9.3% | +10.9% |
| Median age | 47 | 50 |
| Median household income | $69,316/yr | $87,048/yr +26% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $210/wk | $306/wk +46% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.3%).
Property market
| Glen Creek | Yackandandah | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $830,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $545,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 28 days from 7 sales |
Zoning mix
Yackandandah has more rural and farming land (68% vs 36%).
| Glen Creek | Yackandandah | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 36% | 68% |
| Parks and recreation | 63% | 29% |
| Residential | 0% | 2% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 1% same for both | |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Glen Creek | Yackandandah | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 32 across Alpine | 120 across Indigo |
| Approvals change year on year | -42% | +15% |
Gross rental yield
| Glen Creek | Yackandandah | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 3.4% $560/wk on $850K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Glen Creek | Yackandandah | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — | Higher than 53% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 31% of VIC | Higher than 57% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 12% of VIC | Higher than 49% of VIC |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 51% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 53% of VIC | Higher than 94% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 27% of VIC | Higher than 65% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 32% of VIC |
Liveability
| Glen Creek | Yackandandah | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | B |
| Score | — | 51/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Yackandandah carries more flood risk (26 vs 0); Glen Creek carries more bushfire risk (81 vs 50).
| Glen Creek | Yackandandah | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 81/100 | Moderate 50/100 |
| Crime | Low 24/100 | Low 17/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 | Low 26/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Glen Creek | Yackandandah | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Glen Creek
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Yackandandah
- Yackandandah Primary School Government · Primary above peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Glen Creek | Yackandandah | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 4 |
| Childcare | 0 | 3 |
| GPs | 0 | 1 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 3 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 3 | 15 |
Mobility
Glen Creek sits further from the CBD (323.6 km vs 309.6 km).
| Glen Creek | Yackandandah | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Melbourne | 323.6 km +4% vs other | 309.6 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 232 min | 208 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.5% postcode 3691 | 2.0% postcode 3749 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 79 postcode 3691 | 85 postcode 3749 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (69.0%).
Setting
| Glen Creek | Yackandandah | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 726 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 279 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Glen Creek | Yackandandah | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 26/100 | 30/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 27 premises | 0% 827 premises |
Climate
| Glen Creek | Yackandandah | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 984 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Glen Creek | Yackandandah | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,945/yr | $1,828/yr |
| Council | Alpine | Indigo |
Federal electorate
| Glen Creek | Yackandandah | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Indi same for both | |
| Member | Helen Haines same for both | |
| Party | Independent same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Glen Creek | Yackandandah | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Glen Creek
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Glen Creek
Other comparisons with Yackandandah
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.