Gledswood Hills vs Harrington Park
Gledswood Hills is the younger of the two, with a median age of 31 against 35 in Harrington Park. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and the large majority of households are couple families. On these figures, Gledswood Hills tends to suit young adults and families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Harrington Park
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (24/100 vs 54/100)
- has more parks and reserves (19 vs 9)
- has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Gledswood Hills
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper land ($1,115,000 vs $1,700,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Gledswood Hills
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (23% vs 13%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Gledswood Hills sits closer to the CBD (56.4 km vs 63.9 km)
- Harrington Park is more walkable (69/100 vs 51/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Harrington Park
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (24/100 vs 54/100)
- is more walkable (69/100 vs 51/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Gledswood Hills
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (3.3% vs 2.7%)
Weighs house yield.
Where they sit
Gledswood Hills and Harrington Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Harrington Park has more residents (13,332 vs 6,112); Harrington Park skews older (35 vs 31).
| Gledswood Hills | Harrington Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,112 | 13,332 +118% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | — | +25.0% |
| Median age | 31 | 35 |
| Median household income | $144,560/yr | $156,728/yr +8% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $540/wk | $550/wk +2% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (14.6%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Gledswood Hills | Harrington Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,360,000 | $1,440,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $1,115,000 | $1,700,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 28 days from 112 sales | 27 days from 100 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
14 vs 9 sales
105 vs 135 sales
40 vs 56 sales
Zoning mix
Harrington Park has more land zoned for conservation (37% vs 5%).
| Gledswood Hills | Harrington Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 43% | 51% |
| Environmental | 5% | 37% |
| Parks and recreation | 32% | 8% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 9% | 4% |
| Commercial | 6% | 0% |
| Rural and farming | 4% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Gledswood Hills | Harrington Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,671 across Camden same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -21% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Gledswood Hills | Harrington Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.3% $880/wk on $1.38M | 2.7% $895/wk on $1.71M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Gledswood Hills | Harrington Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 67% of NSW | Higher than 75% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 94% of NSW | Higher than 96% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 81% of NSW | Higher than 88% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 73% of NSW | Higher than 67% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 91% of NSW | Higher than 79% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 97% of NSW | Higher than 92% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 35% of NSW | Higher than 12% of NSW |
Liveability
Harrington Park is more walkable (69 vs 51); Harrington Park scores higher overall (75 vs 67).
| Gledswood Hills | Harrington Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | A |
| Score | 67/100 | 75/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Gledswood Hills carries more crime risk (54 vs 24).
| Gledswood Hills | Harrington Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 19/100 | Low 25/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 54/100 | Low 24/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Gledswood Hills | Harrington Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 Western Sydney University - Campbelltown, 6.7 km | 1 Western Sydney University - Campbelltown, 8.3 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 1.7% | 2.8% |
Schools in Gledswood Hills
- Gledswood Hills Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Gledswood Hills High School Government · Secondary below peers
Schools in Harrington Park
- Harrington Park Public School Government · Primary above peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Gledswood Hills | Harrington Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 3 same for both | |
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 19 |
| Childcare | 7 | 5 |
| GPs | 2 same for both | |
| Pharmacies | 2 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 6 | 3 |
Mobility
Harrington Park sits further from the CBD (63.9 km vs 56.4 km).
| Gledswood Hills | Harrington Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 51/100 | 69/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 56.4 km | 63.9 km +13% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 53 min | 57 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 102.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 180.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.7% postcode 2557 | 0.9% postcode 2567 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 69 postcode 2557 | 58 postcode 2567 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (55.3%).
Setting
| Gledswood Hills | Harrington Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 112 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 82 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 30.7 km | 32.9 km |
NBN connectivity
| Gledswood Hills | Harrington Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 98/100 | 86/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 94% 987 premises | 75% 3,704 premises |
Climate
| Gledswood Hills | Harrington Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 817 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.4°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 4.2°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Gledswood Hills | Harrington Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.8 µg/m³ | 5.1 µg/m³ |
| PM10 | 14.8 µg/m³ | 13.2 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | 0.97 pphm | 0.37 pphm |
Council rates
| Gledswood Hills | Harrington Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,504/yr same for both | |
| Council | Camden same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Gledswood Hills | Harrington Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Macarthur | Hume |
| Member | Mike Freelander | Angus Taylor |
| Party | Australian Labor Party | Liberal |
First Home Owner Grant
| Gledswood Hills | Harrington Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Gledswood Hills
Harrington Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Gledswood Hills
Other comparisons with Harrington Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.