Gledswood Hills vs Eschol Park
Gledswood Hills is the younger of the two, with a median age of 31 against 36 in Eschol Park. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Gledswood Hills, the large majority of households are couple families. In Eschol Park, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Gledswood Hills: a median of $1.36 million, against $945,000 in Eschol Park, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Gledswood Hills tends to suit families with children and couples, while Eschol Park suits buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Gledswood Hills
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (7 vs 0)
- has more parks and reserves (9 vs 5)
- is already more of a family suburb (87% vs 72%)
- But Eschol Park carries lower crime risk (34/100 vs 54/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Eschol Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($945,000 vs $1,360,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Eschol Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($400/wk vs $540/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Eschol Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has a shorter drive in (48 min vs 53 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Eschol Park
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more residents already 65 and over (13% vs 4%)
- carries lower crime risk (34/100 vs 54/100)
- But Gledswood Hills has more GPs (2 vs 0)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house yield.
Where they sit
Gledswood Hills and Eschol Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Gledswood Hills has more residents (6,112 vs 2,607); Gledswood Hills has higher household incomes ($144,560 vs $96,252).
| Gledswood Hills | Eschol Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,112 +57% vs other | 2,607 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | — | +1.0% |
| Median age | 31 | 36 |
| Median household income | $144,560/yr +33% vs other | $96,252/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $540/wk +26% vs other | $400/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.7%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Gledswood Hills | Eschol Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,360,000 | $945,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $720,500 |
| Median land price | $1,115,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 28 days from 112 sales | 23 days from 20 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
14 vs 46 sales
105 vs 11 sales
Zoning mix
Eschol Park has more land zoned for conservation (55% vs 5%).
| Gledswood Hills | Eschol Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | 5% | 55% |
| Residential | 43% | 28% |
| Parks and recreation | 32% | 16% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 9% | 2% |
| Commercial | 6% | 0% |
| Rural and farming | 4% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Gledswood Hills | Eschol Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,671 across Camden | 1,788 across Campbelltown (NSW) |
| Approvals change year on year | -21% | +48% |
Gross rental yield
| Gledswood Hills | Eschol Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.3% $880/wk on $1.38M | 3.3% $600/wk on $945K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Gledswood Hills | Eschol Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 67% of NSW | Higher than 46% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 94% of NSW | Higher than 63% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 81% of NSW | Higher than 80% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 73% of NSW | Higher than 66% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 91% of NSW | Higher than 32% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 97% of NSW | Higher than 82% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 35% of NSW same for both | |
Liveability
Gledswood Hills scores higher overall (67 vs 58).
| Gledswood Hills | Eschol Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 67/100 | 58/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 |
Risk profile
Gledswood Hills carries more bushfire risk (19 vs 0); Gledswood Hills carries more crime risk (54 vs 34).
| Gledswood Hills | Eschol Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 19/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 54/100 | Low 34/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 7 within 5 km |
Schools
| Gledswood Hills | Eschol Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 Western Sydney University - Campbelltown, 6.7 km | 1 Western Sydney University - Campbelltown, 3.9 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 1.7% | 1.2% |
Schools in Gledswood Hills
- Gledswood Hills Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Gledswood Hills High School Government · Secondary below peers
Schools in Eschol Park
- Eschol Park Public School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Gledswood Hills | Eschol Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 3 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 5 |
| Childcare | 7 | 0 |
| GPs | 2 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 2 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 6 | 1 |
Mobility
| Gledswood Hills | Eschol Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 51/100 | 47/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 56.4 km +3% vs other | 54.7 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 53 min | 48 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus | 70/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 102.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 21.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.7% postcode 2557 | 0.3% postcode 2558 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 69 postcode 2557 | 55 postcode 2558 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (61.8%).
Setting
| Gledswood Hills | Eschol Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 112 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 94 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 30.7 km | 27.7 km |
NBN connectivity
| Gledswood Hills | Eschol Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 98/100 | 75/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Hybrid fibre-coaxial |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 94% 987 premises | 0% 932 premises |
Climate
| Gledswood Hills | Eschol Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 817 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.4°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 4.2°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Gledswood Hills | Eschol Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.97 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Gledswood Hills | Eschol Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,504/yr | $1,443/yr |
| Council | Camden | Campbelltown (NSW) |
Federal electorate
| Gledswood Hills | Eschol Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Macarthur same for both | |
| Member | Mike Freelander same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Gledswood Hills | Eschol Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Gledswood Hills
Eschol Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Gledswood Hills
Other comparisons with Eschol Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.