Glamorgan Vale vs Ironbark
Ironbark is the younger of the two, with a median age of 34 against 50 in Glamorgan Vale. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Glamorgan Vale tends to suit people living alone and older residents, while Ironbark suits young adults.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Glamorgan Vale
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Ironbark
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (18% vs 32%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Glamorgan Vale has cheaper rent ($300/wk vs $325/wk)
- Ironbark leaves renters under less rental stress (16% vs 21%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Ironbark
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (50.4 km vs 60.2 km)
- has a shorter drive in (46 min vs 52 min)
- But Glamorgan Vale is more walkable (23/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Glamorgan Vale
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (23/100 vs 0/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (23% vs 6%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Ironbark
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (94.2% vs -5.0%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Glamorgan Vale and Ironbark drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Ironbark has more residents (1,173 vs 384); Glamorgan Vale skews older (50 vs 34).
| Glamorgan Vale | Ironbark | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 384 | 1,173 +205% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -5.0% | +94.2% |
| Median age | 50 | 34 |
| Median household income | $74,984/yr | $107,900/yr +44% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $300/wk | $325/wk +8% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (33.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.6%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.3%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Glamorgan Vale | Ironbark | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,260,000 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Development activity
| Glamorgan Vale | Ironbark | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 363 across Somerset | 3,476 across Ipswich |
| Approvals change year on year | +375% | -7% |
Ranking within QLD
| Glamorgan Vale | Ironbark | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 46% of QLD | Higher than 80% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 80% of QLD | Higher than 50% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 85% of QLD | Higher than 87% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 51% of QLD | Higher than 62% of QLD |
Liveability
Glamorgan Vale is more walkable (23 vs 0).
| Glamorgan Vale | Ironbark | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | B |
| Score | — | 52/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 |
Risk profile
| Glamorgan Vale | Ironbark | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 53/100 same for both | |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | Moderate 50/100 | High 70/100 |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Glamorgan Vale | Ironbark | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Glamorgan Vale
- Glamorgan Vale State School Government · Primary above peers
Schools in Ironbark
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Glamorgan Vale | Ironbark | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 7 | 3 |
Mobility
Glamorgan Vale sits further from the CBD (60.2 km vs 50.4 km).
| Glamorgan Vale | Ironbark | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 23/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 60.2 km +16% vs other | 50.4 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 52 min | 46 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.2% postcode 4306 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (77.9%).
Setting
| Glamorgan Vale | Ironbark | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 57 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 66 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 47.2 km | 46.3 km |
NBN connectivity
| Glamorgan Vale | Ironbark | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 161 premises | 0% 121 premises |
Climate
| Glamorgan Vale | Ironbark | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 897 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 31.3°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.1°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Glamorgan Vale | Ironbark | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 20.4 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.64 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Glamorgan Vale | Ironbark | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,063/yr | $1,713/yr |
| Council | Somerset | Ipswich |
Federal electorate
| Glamorgan Vale | Ironbark | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Blair same for both | |
| Member | Shayne Neumann same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Glamorgan Vale | Ironbark | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Ironbark
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Glamorgan Vale
Other comparisons with Ironbark
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.