Gladstone Park vs Tullamarine
Tullamarine is the younger of the two, with a median age of 39 against 42 in Gladstone Park. In both, most households own their home and most homes are detached houses. In Gladstone Park, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Gladstone Park tends to suit couples, while Tullamarine suits people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Gladstone Park
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools inside the suburb (4 vs 1)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (96% vs 59%)
- carries lower crime risk (65/100 vs 88/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Tullamarine
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (35% vs 21%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Gladstone Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (78/100 vs 61/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Gladstone Park
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (65/100 vs 88/100)
- is more walkable (78/100 vs 61/100)
- But Tullamarine has more units and townhouses to downsize into (41% vs 4%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Gladstone Park and Tullamarine drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Gladstone Park skews older (42 vs 39).
| Gladstone Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,213 +18% vs other | 6,733 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -1.5% | +1.9% |
| Median age | 42 | 39 |
| Median household income | $75,504/yr +3% vs other | $73,008/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $381/wk +7% vs other | $355/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (13.9%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.3%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Gladstone Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $810,000 | $795,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $540,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 18 days from 30 sales | 24 days from 66 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
79 vs 86 sales
52 vs 21 sales
Zoning mix
Tullamarine has more industrially zoned land (32% vs 0%); Tullamarine has more commercially zoned land (23% vs 2%).
| Gladstone Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 66% | 25% |
| Industrial | 0% | 32% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 28% | 16% |
| Commercial | 2% | 23% |
| Parks and recreation | 4% | 3% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Gladstone Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 3,063 across Hume same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +0% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Gladstone Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.2% $600/wk on $735K | 4.1% $585/wk on $750K |
| Units | — | 4.5% $500/wk on $584K |
Ranking within VIC
| Gladstone Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 51% of VIC | Higher than 54% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 42% of VIC | Higher than 38% of VIC |
| Schools | Higher than 59% of VIC | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 92% of VIC | Higher than 88% of VIC |
| Affordability | Higher than 38% of VIC | Higher than 31% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 84% of VIC same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 98% of VIC | Higher than 100% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 83% of VIC | Higher than 71% of VIC |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 29% of VIC |
Liveability
Gladstone Park is more walkable (78 vs 61); Gladstone Park scores higher overall (53 vs 45).
| Gladstone Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | C |
| Score | 53/100 | 45/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Tullamarine carries more bushfire risk (34 vs 0); Gladstone Park carries more flood risk (65 vs 20).
| Gladstone Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Low 34/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 65/100 | High 88/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 65/100 | Low 20/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | High 70/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 11 within 5 km | 8 within 5 km |
Schools
| Gladstone Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 4 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 2 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
Schools in Gladstone Park
- Gladstone Park Primary School Government · Primary above peers
- Gladstone Park Secondary College Government · Secondary at peers
- School of the Good Shepherd Catholic · Primary at peers
- Gladstone Views Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Tullamarine
- Tullamarine Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Gladstone Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 2 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 9 |
| Parks & reserves | 13 | 14 |
| Childcare | 5 same for both | |
| GPs | 3 | 4 |
| Pharmacies | 1 same for both | |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 2 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 2 | 3 |
| Waterways | 4 | 7 |
Mobility
| Gladstone Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 78/100 | 61/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 19.6 km +10% vs other | 17.7 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 25 min | 24 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 126.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 160.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.3% postcode 3043 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 27 postcode 3043 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (68.6%).
Setting
| Gladstone Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 109 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 85 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 16.8 km | 15.5 km |
NBN connectivity
| Gladstone Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 98/100 | 100/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 94% 3,546 premises | 99% 5,165 premises |
Climate
| Gladstone Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 534 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 26.7°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Gladstone Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | — same for both | |
| PM10 | 18.9 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Gladstone Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,715/yr same for both | |
| Council | Hume same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Gladstone Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Maribyrnong same for both | |
| Member | Jo Briskey same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Gladstone Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Gladstone Park
Tullamarine
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Gladstone Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.