Gilead vs Douglas Park
Douglas Park is the younger of the two, with a median age of 42 against 74 in Gilead. In both, the large majority of households own their home. In Gilead, the large majority of households are people living alone. In Douglas Park, the large majority of homes are detached houses and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Douglas Park: a median of $1.42 million, against $886,000 in Gilead, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Gilead tends to suit people living alone, older residents, and buyers on a tighter budget, while Douglas Park suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Douglas Park
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more separate houses rather than flats (96% vs 4%)
- is already more of a family suburb (77% vs 11%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Gilead
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper land ($700,000 vs $1,528,000)
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (15% vs 24%)
- has cheaper houses ($885,745 vs $1,420,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Gilead has cheaper rent ($265/wk vs $446/wk)
- Douglas Park leaves renters under less rental stress (20% vs 35%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Gilead sits closer to the CBD (67.7 km vs 74 km)
- Douglas Park is more walkable (50/100 vs 5/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Gilead
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (98% vs 4%)
- has more residents already 65 and over (87% vs 19%)
- But Douglas Park is more walkable (50/100 vs 5/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Gilead
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (111.5% vs 1.8%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Gilead and Douglas Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Douglas Park has higher household incomes ($117,000 vs $39,416); Gilead skews older (74 vs 42).
| Gilead | Douglas Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 882 | 1,386 +57% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +111.5% | +1.8% |
| Median age | 74 | 42 |
| Median household income | $39,416/yr | $117,000/yr +197% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $265/wk | $446/wk +68% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (40.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.3%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Gilead | Douglas Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $885,745 | $1,420,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $700,000 | $1,528,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 60 days from 22 sales | 72 days from 7 sales |
Zoning mix
Douglas Park has more rural and farming land (89% vs 54%); Gilead has more land zoned for conservation (14% vs 3%).
| Gilead | Douglas Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 54% | 89% |
| Environmental | 14% | 3% |
| Residential | 13% | 2% |
| Parks and recreation | 12% | 0% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 4% | 5% |
| Other and special use | 3% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Gilead | Douglas Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,788 across Campbelltown (NSW) | 1,338 across Wollondilly |
| Approvals change year on year | +48% | +92% |
Gross rental yield
| Gilead | Douglas Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.4% $840/wk on $1.28M | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Gilead | Douglas Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 23% of NSW | Higher than 68% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 4% of NSW | Higher than 81% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 46% of NSW | Higher than 81% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 27% of NSW | Higher than 55% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 74% of NSW | Higher than 52% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 64% of NSW | Higher than 80% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 39% of NSW | — |
Liveability
Douglas Park is more walkable (50 vs 5); Douglas Park scores higher overall (45 vs 24).
| Gilead | Douglas Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | D | C |
| Score | 24/100 | 45/100 |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 2/10 | advantaged area decile 8/10 |
Risk profile
| Gilead | Douglas Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 84/100 | High 79/100 |
| Crime | Low 34/100 | Moderate 43/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 3 within 5 km |
Schools
| Gilead | Douglas Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 Western Sydney University - Campbelltown, 8.4 km | None |
Schools in Gilead
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Douglas Park
- Douglas Park Public School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Gilead | Douglas Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 2 same for both | |
| Childcare | 0 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 21 | 1 |
Mobility
Douglas Park sits further from the CBD (74 km vs 67.7 km).
| Gilead | Douglas Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 5/100 | 50/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 67.7 km | 74 km +9% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 66 min | 65 min |
| Public transport score | 27/100 Bus | 45/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 3.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 13.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 12 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.8% postcode 2560 | 0.5% postcode 2569 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 44 postcode 2560 | 72 postcode 2569 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (64.2%).
Setting
| Gilead | Douglas Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 182 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 117 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 21.7 km | 24.3 km |
NBN connectivity
| Gilead | Douglas Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 39/100 | 73/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 8% 38 premises | 44% 497 premises |
Climate
| Gilead | Douglas Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 817 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.4°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 4.2°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Gilead | Douglas Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.97 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Gilead | Douglas Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,443/yr | $2,099/yr |
| Council | Campbelltown (NSW) | Wollondilly |
Federal electorate
| Gilead | Douglas Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Macarthur | Hume |
| Member | Mike Freelander | Angus Taylor |
| Party | Australian Labor Party | Liberal |
First Home Owner Grant
| Gilead | Douglas Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Gilead
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Gilead
Other comparisons with Douglas Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.