Georges Hall vs Condell Park
Comparing Georges Hall and Condell Park, NSW: Condell Park has more residents (13,066 vs 9,739); Condell Park carries more crime risk (49 vs 39); and Georges Hall scores higher overall (65 vs 53).
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Georges Hall
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
- has more parks and reserves (24 vs 12)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (86% vs 66%)
- But Condell Park has more childcare (16 vs 10)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Georges Hall
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper units ($565,000 vs $999,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Georges Hall sits closer to the CBD (27.6 km vs 30.5 km)
- Condell Park is more walkable (81/100 vs 70/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Condell Park
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (34% vs 14%)
- is more walkable (81/100 vs 70/100)
- But Georges Hall carries lower crime risk (39/100 vs 49/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Condell Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (12.9% vs 7.8%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Georges Hall and Condell Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Condell Park has more residents (13,066 vs 9,739); Georges Hall skews older (36 vs 34).
| Georges Hall | Condell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,739 | 13,066 +34% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +7.8% | +12.9% |
| Median age | 36 | 34 |
| Median household income | $92,820/yr +8% vs other | $85,072/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $520/wk +4% vs other | $500/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (10.1%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (10.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Georges Hall | Condell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,513,000 | $1,606,250 |
| Median unit price | $565,000 | $999,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 24 days from 43 sales | 24 days from 89 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
27 vs 34 sales
23 vs 50 sales
17 vs 28 sales
Zoning mix
Condell Park has more industrially zoned land (17% vs 0%).
| Georges Hall | Condell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 70% same for both | |
| Parks and recreation | 24% | 8% |
| Industrial | 0% | 17% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 4% same for both | |
| Environmental | 2% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Georges Hall | Condell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,785 across Canterbury-Bankstown same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +50% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Georges Hall | Condell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.5% $995/wk on $1.48M | 3.3% $900/wk on $1.4M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Georges Hall | Condell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 73% of NSW | Higher than 77% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 60% of NSW | Higher than 54% of NSW |
| Schools | Higher than 58% of NSW | Higher than 23% of NSW |
| Walkability | Higher than 88% of NSW | Higher than 93% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 30% of NSW | Higher than 19% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 60% of NSW | Higher than 72% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 81% of NSW | Higher than 85% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 45% of NSW | Higher than 36% of NSW |
Liveability
Georges Hall scores higher overall (65 vs 53); Condell Park is more walkable (81 vs 70).
| Georges Hall | Condell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 65/100 | 53/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 |
Risk profile
Condell Park carries more crime risk (49 vs 39).
| Georges Hall | Condell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 39/100 | Moderate 49/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | High 70/100 | None 0/100 |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 16 within 5 km | 15 within 5 km |
Schools
| Georges Hall | Condell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 4 | 3 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 2 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 2 |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Western Sydney University - Bankstown City, 4.2 km | 3 Western Sydney University - Bankstown City, 2.0 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.8% | 3.3% |
Schools in Georges Hall
- St Mary's Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary above peers
- Georges Hall Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Georges River Grammar Independent · Combined at peers
- HopePoint Christian School Independent · Primary below peers
Schools in Condell Park
- Condell Park Christian School Independent · Combined at peers
- Condell Park High School Government · Secondary below peers
- Condell Park Public School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Georges Hall | Condell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 3 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 24 | 12 |
| Childcare | 10 | 16 |
| GPs | 1 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 2 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 same for both | |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 2 |
Mobility
Condell Park sits further from the CBD (30.5 km vs 27.6 km).
| Georges Hall | Condell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 70/100 | 81/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 27.6 km | 30.5 km +11% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 37 min | 33 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 172.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 169.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 2198 | 0.8% postcode 2200 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 34 postcode 2198 | 18 postcode 2200 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (55.9%).
Setting
| Georges Hall | Condell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 19 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 42 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 16.6 km 2.2 km to a named beach | 14.0 km 4.7 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Georges Hall | Condell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 74/100 | 76/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 18% 3,282 premises | 9% 4,657 premises |
Climate
| Georges Hall | Condell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 909 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.7°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.4°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Georges Hall | Condell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 16.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.9 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Georges Hall | Condell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,322/yr same for both | |
| Council | Canterbury-Bankstown same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Georges Hall | Condell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Watson same for both | |
| Member | Tony Burke same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Georges Hall | Condell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Georges Hall
Condell Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Georges Hall
Other comparisons with Condell Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.