Frogmore vs Godfreys Creek

In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Frogmore, about half of households are people living alone. In Godfreys Creek, most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Frogmore: a median of $240,000, against $45,000 in Godfreys Creek, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Godfreys Creek tends to suit couples, older residents, and buyers on a tighter budget.

Which one suits you?

There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.

Families with school-age kids

Godfreys Creek

ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here

  • carries lower crime risk (12/100 vs 73/100)
  • is already more of a family suburb (60% vs 45%)

Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.

First-home buyers

Godfreys Creek

ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here

  • has cheaper houses ($45,000 vs $240,000)
  • leaves households under less mortgage stress (15% vs 23%)
  • But Frogmore has cheaper land ($86,000 vs $129,000)

Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.

Renters

Godfreys Creek

ahead on the one thing that separates them

  • has cheaper rent ($1/wk vs $40/wk)

Weighs rent and rental stress.

Commuting to the city

Frogmore

ahead on the one thing that separates them

  • sits closer to the CBD (320.9 km vs 358.5 km)

Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.

Downsizers and retirees

Godfreys Creek

ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here

  • carries lower crime risk (12/100 vs 73/100)
  • has more residents already 65 and over (43% vs 28%)

Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.

Investors

Frogmore

ahead on the one thing that separates them

  • is growing faster (10.6% vs -14.5%)

Weighs population growth.

Where they sit

Frogmore and Godfreys Creek drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.

Frogmore Godfreys Creek
Hides rows where both suburbs match

Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.

Side by side, out of 100

Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.

Frogmore Godfreys Creek
Walkability 0 / 0
Frogmore — Walkability: 0/100 Godfreys Creek — Walkability: 0/100
Safety 27 / 88
Frogmore — Safety: 27/100 Godfreys Creek — Safety: 88/100
Low fire risk 79 / 53
Frogmore — Low fire risk: 79/100 Godfreys Creek — Low fire risk: 53/100

Demographics

Frogmore rents higher ($40/wk vs $1/wk); Frogmore has more residents (146 vs 65).

Frogmore Godfreys Creek
Population 146
+55% vs other
 65
Population trend (2016 → 2021) +10.6% -14.5%
Median age 48 46
Median household income $81,224/yr $95,836/yr
+18% vs other
Median weekly rent $40/wk
+98% vs other
 $1/wk

Age profile

Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.

Frogmore Godfreys Creek
0-4 2.1% / —
Frogmore — 0-4: 2.1% Godfreys Creek — 0-4: not among its largest
5-14 11.0% / 15.4%
Frogmore — 5-14: 11.0% Godfreys Creek — 5-14: 15.4%
15-19 4.8% / 10.8%
Frogmore — 15-19: 4.8% Godfreys Creek — 15-19: 10.8%
20-24 8.9% / —
Frogmore — 20-24: 8.9% Godfreys Creek — 20-24: not among its largest
25-34 13.7% / 4.6%
Frogmore — 25-34: 13.7% Godfreys Creek — 25-34: 4.6%
35-44 8.2% / 13.8%
Frogmore — 35-44: 8.2% Godfreys Creek — 35-44: 13.8%
45-54 14.4% / 15.4%
Frogmore — 45-54: 14.4% Godfreys Creek — 45-54: 15.4%
55-64 14.4% / 12.3%
Frogmore — 55-64: 14.4% Godfreys Creek — 55-64: 12.3%
65-74 13.0% / 26.2%
Frogmore — 65-74: 13.0% Godfreys Creek — 65-74: 26.2%
75-84 11.0% / 9.2%
Frogmore — 75-84: 11.0% Godfreys Creek — 75-84: 9.2%
85+ 4.1% / 7.7%
Frogmore — 85+: 4.1% Godfreys Creek — 85+: 7.7%

Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (26.2%).

Who lives together

Household composition, 2021 Census.

Frogmore 33.3% couple families
Frogmore — Couple Families: 33.3% Frogmore — Lone Person: 45.5% Frogmore — One Parent Families: 12.1% Frogmore — Group Household: 9.1%
Godfreys Creek 60.0% couple families
Godfreys Creek — Couple Families: 60.0% Godfreys Creek — Lone Person: 40.0% Godfreys Creek — One Parent Families: 0.0% Godfreys Creek — Group Household: 0.0%
Couple Families Lone Person One Parent Families Group Household

Who owns and who rents

Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.

Frogmore 16.7% renting
Frogmore — Owned Outright: 66.7% Frogmore — Mortgage: 16.7% Frogmore — Renting: 16.7%
Godfreys Creek 0.0% renting
Godfreys Creek — Owned Outright: 82.4% Godfreys Creek — Mortgage: 17.6% Godfreys Creek — Renting: 0.0%
Owned outright Mortgage Renting

What people live in

Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.

Frogmore 100.0% houses
Frogmore — Houses: 100.0%
Godfreys Creek 100.0% houses
Godfreys Creek — Houses: 100.0%
Houses

Qualifications

Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.

Frogmore Godfreys Creek
Certificate III & IV 17.8% / 15.4%
Frogmore — Certificate III & IV: 17.8% Godfreys Creek — Certificate III & IV: 15.4%
Advanced Diploma / Diploma 8.2% / 10.8%
Frogmore — Advanced Diploma / Diploma: 8.2% Godfreys Creek — Advanced Diploma / Diploma: 10.8%
Bachelor Degree 11.0% / 4.6%
Frogmore — Bachelor Degree: 11.0% Godfreys Creek — Bachelor Degree: 4.6%

Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.8%).

Property market

Frogmore Godfreys Creek
Median house price $240,000 $45,000
Median unit price $725,000 —
Median land price $86,000 $129,000

Zoning mix

Frogmore Godfreys Creek
Rural and farming 100% 99%
Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09.

Development activity

Frogmore Godfreys Creek
New dwellings approved 48
across Hilltops
same for both
Approvals change year on year -47%
same for both

Ranking within NSW

Frogmore Godfreys Creek
House price Higher than 5% of NSW Higher than 1% of NSW
Income Higher than 49% of NSW Higher than 63% of NSW
Schools —
same for both
Walkability Higher than 24% of NSW Higher than 44% of NSW
Affordability Higher than 97% of NSW Higher than 100% of NSW
EV adoption Higher than 4% of NSW
same for both
NBN connectivity Higher than 13% of NSW Higher than 23% of NSW

Liveability

Frogmore Godfreys Creek
Grade —
same for both
Score —
same for both
Socio-economic band mid-range socio-economic
decile 4/10
 advantaged area
decile 7/10

Risk profile

Frogmore carries more crime risk (73 vs 12); Godfreys Creek carries more bushfire risk (47 vs 21).

Frogmore Godfreys Creek
Bushfire Low
21/100
 Moderate
47/100
Crime High
73/100
 Low
12/100
Flood Not mapped
no mapped data here
same for both
Coastal erosion None
0/100
same for both
Aircraft noise None
0/100
same for both
Industrial facilities nearby 0
within 5 km
same for both

Schools

Frogmore Godfreys Creek
Inside the suburb 0
same for both
Rated above peers 0
same for both
Rated at peers 0
same for both
Rated below peers 0
same for both

Amenities in the suburb

Frogmore Godfreys Creek
Parks & reserves 0 1
Waterways 30 11

Mobility

Godfreys Creek sits further from the CBD (358.5 km vs 320.9 km).

Frogmore Godfreys Creek
Walkability score 0/100
same for both
Distance to Sydney 320.9 km 358.5 km
+12% vs other
Drive time (normal traffic) 229 min 233 min
Electric vehicle share 0.1%
postcode 2586
same for both
Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings 62
postcode 2586
same for both

How people get to work

Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.

Frogmore Godfreys Creek
Car (driver) 52.1% / 53.8%
Frogmore — Car (driver): 52.1% Godfreys Creek — Car (driver): 53.8%
Worked from Home 38.0% / 34.6%
Frogmore — Worked from Home: 38.0% Godfreys Creek — Worked from Home: 34.6%
Walked Only 4.2% / 11.5%
Frogmore — Walked Only: 4.2% Godfreys Creek — Walked Only: 11.5%
Car (passenger) 5.6% / —
Frogmore — Car (passenger): 5.6% Godfreys Creek — Car (passenger): not among its largest

Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (53.8%).

Setting

Frogmore Godfreys Creek
Elevation 544 m
above sea level, at the suburb centre
 471 m
above sea level, at the suburb centre

NBN connectivity

Frogmore Godfreys Creek
Connectivity score 15/100
same for both
Most common technology Satellite (Sky Muster)
same for both
Full-fibre (FTTP) share 0%
55 premises
 0%
26 premises

Council rates

Frogmore Godfreys Creek
Average residential rate $714/yr
same for both
Council Hilltops
same for both

Federal electorate

Frogmore Godfreys Creek
Division Riverina
same for both
Member Michael Mccormack
same for both
Party The Nationals
same for both

First Home Owner Grant

Frogmore Godfreys Creek
Grant amount $10,000
same for both
Property price cap $600,000
same for both
Eligibility New
same for both

Tags

Frogmore

Affordable Retirees Rural

Godfreys Creek

Affordable Retirees Rural

More comparisons

Other comparisons with Frogmore

Frogmore vs Boorowa Frogmore vs Reids Flat Frogmore vs Rugby Frogmore vs Taylors Flat

Other comparisons with Godfreys Creek

Godfreys Creek vs Boorowa Godfreys Creek vs Koorawatha Godfreys Creek vs Murringo Godfreys Creek vs Crowther
Full data on Frogmore Full data on Godfreys Creek
Unlock full address-level data — $29/month

Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.

Save this page for later

We'll email you a link to this page so you can finish reading it on any device. We use your address once to send it and don't keep it.

or