Frankford vs Reedy Marsh
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Reedy Marsh, about half of households are people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Reedy Marsh
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more parks and reserves (11 vs 4)
Weighs schools, house stock, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Frankford
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (16% vs 29%)
- has cheaper rent ($190/wk vs $300/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Reedy Marsh
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (233.3 km vs 244 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, and walkability.
Investors
Reedy Marsh
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (7.6% vs -6.2%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Frankford and Reedy Marsh drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Reedy Marsh rents higher ($300/wk vs $190/wk); Frankford has higher household incomes ($60,112 vs $53,248).
| Frankford | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 165 | 199 +21% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -6.2% | +7.6% |
| Median age | 51 | 53 |
| Median household income | $60,112/yr +11% vs other | $53,248/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $190/wk | $300/wk +58% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.6%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.6%).
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Frankford | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $750,000 | $736,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 76 days from 3 sales | — |
Zoning mix
Frankford has more rural and farming land (94% vs 59%); Reedy Marsh has more land zoned for conservation (39% vs 5%).
| Frankford | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 94% | 59% |
| Environmental | 5% | 39% |
| Other and special use | 0% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Frankford | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 159 across West Tamar | 202 across Meander Valley |
| Approvals change year on year | +11% | +67% |
Ranking within TAS
| Frankford | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 36% of TAS | Higher than 25% of TAS |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 1% of TAS | Higher than 58% of TAS |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 64% of TAS | Higher than 60% of TAS |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 20% of TAS | Higher than 30% of TAS |
Liveability
| Frankford | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | high-need area decile 1/10 | below-average income decile 3/10 |
Risk profile
Frankford carries more bushfire risk (29 vs 13).
| Frankford | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 29/100 | Low 13/100 |
| Crime | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Frankford | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Frankford | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 11 |
| Waterways | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
Frankford sits further from the CBD (244 km vs 233.3 km).
| Frankford | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Hobart | 244 km +4% vs other | 233.3 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 175 min | 178 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.5% postcode 7275 | 0.5% postcode 7304 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 44 postcode 7275 | 32 postcode 7304 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.0%).
Setting
| Frankford | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 206 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 219 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 22.0 km | 33.8 km |
NBN connectivity
| Frankford | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 16/100 | 25/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 41 premises | 0% 76 premises |
Climate
| Frankford | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 720 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Frankford | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,859/yr | $875/yr |
| Council | West Tamar | Meander Valley |
Federal electorate
| Frankford | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Bass | Lyons |
| Member | Jess Teesdale | Rebecca White |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Frankford | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $20,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Frankford
Other comparisons with Reedy Marsh
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.