Four Mile Creek vs Gray
Gray is the younger of the two, with a median age of 54 against 61 in Four Mile Creek. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Four Mile Creek, about half of households are people living alone. In Gray, most households are people living alone. On these figures, Four Mile Creek tends to suit older residents, while Gray suits people living alone and families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Four Mile Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is already more of a family suburb (50% vs 30%)
Weighs schools, house stock, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Gray
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (19% vs 45%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Gray
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($0/wk vs $250/wk)
Weighs rent.
Commuting to the city
Gray
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (10/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (170 min vs 212 min)
- But Four Mile Creek sits closer to the CBD (220.5 km vs 225 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Four Mile Creek has more residents already 65 and over (38% vs 30%)
- Gray is more walkable (10/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, and walkability.
Investors
Four Mile Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (22.9% vs 2.9%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Four Mile Creek and Gray drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Four Mile Creek rents higher ($250/wk vs $0/wk); Four Mile Creek has more residents (118 vs 71).
| Four Mile Creek | Gray | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 118 +40% vs other | 71 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +22.9% | +2.9% |
| Median age | 61 | 54 |
| Median household income | $46,800/yr +25% vs other | $35,100/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $250/wk (not reported on the other side) | — |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (31.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (8.5%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.5%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Zoning mix
Gray has more rural and farming land (91% vs 30%); Four Mile Creek has more land zoned for conservation (69% vs 9%).
| Four Mile Creek | Gray | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 30% | 91% |
| Environmental | 69% | 9% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 1% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Four Mile Creek | Gray | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 48 across Break O'Day same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +0% same for both | |
Ranking within TAS
| Four Mile Creek | Gray | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 14% of TAS | Higher than 4% of TAS |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 14% of TAS | Higher than 76% of TAS |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 48% of TAS | Higher than 50% of TAS |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 29% of TAS | Higher than 25% of TAS |
Liveability
Gray is more walkable (10 vs 0).
| Four Mile Creek | Gray | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
| Four Mile Creek | Gray | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 82/100 | High 81/100 |
| Crime | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | Moderate 42/100 | None 0/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Four Mile Creek | Gray | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Four Mile Creek | Gray | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 5 |
| Beaches | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 13 | 1 |
Mobility
Gray sits further from the CBD (225 km vs 220.5 km).
| Four Mile Creek | Gray | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 10/100 |
| Distance to Hobart | 220.5 km | 225 km +2% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 212 min | 170 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 7215 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 29 postcode 7215 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (77.8%).
Setting
| Four Mile Creek | Gray | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 111 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 376 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 2.2 km 2.2 km to a named beach | 6.3 km |
NBN connectivity
| Four Mile Creek | Gray | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 25/100 | 20/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Satellite (Sky Muster) |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 70 premises | 0% 25 premises |
Climate
| Four Mile Creek | Gray | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 660 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 21.4°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.8°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Four Mile Creek | Gray | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,738/yr same for both | |
| Council | Break O'Day same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Four Mile Creek | Gray | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Lyons same for both | |
| Member | Rebecca White same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Four Mile Creek | Gray | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $20,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Four Mile Creek
Other comparisons with Gray
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.