Foster vs Yanakie
Yanakie is the younger of the two, with a median age of 51 against 59 in Foster. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Foster, most households are people living alone. On these figures, Foster tends to suit people living alone and older residents, while Yanakie suits families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Yanakie
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (27/100 vs 57/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (46% vs 35%)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (100% vs 88%)
- But Foster has more parks and reserves (6 vs 1)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Yanakie
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (22% vs 32%)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Yanakie
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (16% vs 25%)
- has cheaper rent ($220/wk vs $240/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Foster
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (138 min vs 149 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (175.2 km vs 186.6 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Foster
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has more GPs (2 vs 0)
- has more residents already 65 and over (40% vs 23%)
- But Yanakie carries lower crime risk (27/100 vs 57/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Foster and Yanakie drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Foster has more residents (2,044 vs 283); Yanakie has higher household incomes ($69,212 vs $50,700).
| Foster | Yanakie | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,044 +86% vs other | 283 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +11.0% | +12.7% |
| Median age | 59 | 51 |
| Median household income | $50,700/yr | $69,212/yr +37% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $240/wk +8% vs other | $220/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.0%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.3%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Foster | Yanakie | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $542,500 | $570,000 |
| Median unit price | $485,000 | — |
| Median land price | $787,500 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 82 days from 34 sales | — |
Zoning mix
| Foster | Yanakie | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 91% | 93% |
| Parks and recreation | 4% same for both | |
| Infrastructure and transport | 2% | 1% |
| Residential | 1% | 0% |
| Other and special use | 0% | 1% |
| Planning zones cover 99% of Foster and 100% of Yanakie. The rest is unzoned land such as water or road reserve. | ||
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Foster | Yanakie | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 170 across South Gippsland same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +21% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Foster | Yanakie | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 2.7% $406/wk on $795K | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Foster | Yanakie | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 34% of VIC | — |
| Income | Higher than 10% of VIC | Higher than 31% of VIC |
| Schools | Higher than 70% of VIC | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 65% of VIC | Higher than 53% of VIC |
| Affordability | Higher than 19% of VIC | — |
| EV adoption | Higher than 53% of VIC same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 74% of VIC | Higher than 67% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 6% of VIC | — |
Liveability
| Foster | Yanakie | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | — |
| Score | 46/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
Foster carries more crime risk (57 vs 27); Yanakie carries more flood risk (73 vs 52).
| Foster | Yanakie | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 57/100 | Low 27/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 52/100 | High 73/100 |
| Coastal erosion | High 81/100 | Moderate 60/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Foster | Yanakie | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 3 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
Schools in Foster
- Foster Secondary College Government · Secondary above peers
- Foster Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Corner Inlet College Independent · Secondary below peers
Schools in Yanakie
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Foster | Yanakie | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 2 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 2 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 1 |
| Childcare | 2 | 0 |
| GPs | 2 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Hospitals | 1 | 0 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 3 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 1 same for both | |
| EV chargers | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 11 | 0 |
Mobility
Yanakie sits further from the CBD (186.6 km vs 175.2 km).
| Foster | Yanakie | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 4/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 175.2 km | 186.6 km +7% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 138 min | 149 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.5% postcode 3960 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 54 postcode 3960 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (67.0%).
Setting
| Foster | Yanakie | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 41 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 16 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 3.5 km | 2.5 km |
NBN connectivity
| Foster | Yanakie | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 55/100 | 30/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 28% 1,292 premises | 0% 203 premises |
Council rates
| Foster | Yanakie | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,282/yr same for both | |
| Council | South Gippsland same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Foster | Yanakie | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Monash same for both | |
| Member | Mary Aldred same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Foster | Yanakie | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Foster
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Foster
Other comparisons with Yanakie
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.