Forrestfield vs Kalamunda
Forrestfield is the younger of the two, with a median age of 38 against 49 in Kalamunda. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Kalamunda, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Kalamunda: a median of $1.22 million, against $810,000 in Forrestfield. Forrestfield is closer to the city centre: 20.2 km, against 26.2 km. On these figures, Forrestfield tends to suit buyers on a tighter budget, while Kalamunda suits older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Forrestfield
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (9 vs 3)
- has more parks and reserves (44 vs 22)
- has more schools inside the suburb (6 vs 4)
- But Kalamunda carries lower crime risk (41/100 vs 72/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Forrestfield
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has cheaper houses ($810,000 vs $1,220,000)
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (25% vs 30%)
- But Kalamunda has cheaper land ($660,000 vs $872,500)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Forrestfield
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (20.2 km vs 26.2 km)
- has a shorter drive in (24 min vs 30 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Kalamunda
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (41/100 vs 72/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (29% vs 17%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Forrestfield
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (4.6% vs 3.1%)
- returns a higher gross yield on units (5.6% vs 4.0%)
Weighs house yield, unit yield, and population growth.
Where they sit
Forrestfield and Kalamunda drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Forrestfield has more residents (13,181 vs 7,163); Kalamunda skews older (49 vs 38).
| Forrestfield | Kalamunda | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,181 +46% vs other | 7,163 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +3.9% | +2.8% |
| Median age | 38 | 49 |
| Median household income | $83,928/yr | $84,344/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $350/wk | $360/wk +3% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (14.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.1%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (14.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Forrestfield | Kalamunda | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $810,000 | $1,220,000 |
| Median unit price | $655,000 | $700,000 |
| Median land price | $872,500 | $660,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 28 days from 152 sales | 35 days from 84 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
137 vs 49 sales
111 vs 79 sales
16 vs 15 sales
Development activity
| Forrestfield | Kalamunda | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 214 across Kalamunda same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +124% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Forrestfield | Kalamunda | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.6% $750/wk on $849K | 3.1% $750/wk on $1.25M |
| Units | 5.6% $750/wk on $700K | 4.0% $635/wk on $829K |
Ranking within WA
| Forrestfield | Kalamunda | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 46% of WA same for both | |
| Schools | Higher than 41% of WA | Higher than 53% of WA |
| Walkability | Higher than 94% of WA | Higher than 97% of WA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 63% of WA | Higher than 88% of WA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 92% of WA | Higher than 70% of WA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 66% of WA | Higher than 9% of WA |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 58% of WA | Higher than 7% of WA |
Liveability
Kalamunda scores higher overall (63 vs 48).
| Forrestfield | Kalamunda | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | B |
| Score | 48/100 | 63/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
Forrestfield carries more crime risk (72 vs 41); Kalamunda carries more bushfire risk (76 vs 49).
| Forrestfield | Kalamunda | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 49/100 | High 76/100 |
| Crime | High 72/100 | Moderate 41/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | High 70/100 | None 0/100 |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 18 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Forrestfield | Kalamunda | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 6 | 4 |
| Rated above peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 4 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 Curtin University of Technology, 9.8 km | None |
Schools in Forrestfield
- Dawson Park Primary School Government · Primary above peers
- Darling Range Sports College Government · Secondary at peers
- Heritage College Perth Independent · Combined at peers
- HillSide Christian College Independent · Combined at peers
- Woodlupine Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Forrestfield Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Kalamunda
- Kalamunda Primary School Government · Primary above peers
- Kalamunda Senior High School Government · Secondary at peers
- Kalamunda Primary Education Support Centre Government · Primary · Special school
- Kalamunda Secondary Education Support Centre Government · Secondary · Special school
Amenities in the suburb
| Forrestfield | Kalamunda | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 3 | 4 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 4 | 12 |
| Parks & reserves | 44 | 22 |
| Childcare | 9 | 3 |
| GPs | 4 | 3 |
| Pharmacies | 2 | 4 |
| Hospitals | 0 | 1 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 2 same for both | |
| Fuel stations | 4 | 2 |
| EV chargers | 1 | 0 |
| Beaches | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 31 | 21 |
Mobility
Kalamunda sits further from the CBD (26.2 km vs 20.2 km).
| Forrestfield | Kalamunda | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 79/100 | 84/100 |
| Distance to Perth | 20.2 km | 26.2 km +30% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 24 min | 30 min |
| Public transport score | 94/100 Bus | 79/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 258.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 196.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 6058 | 1.4% postcode 6076 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 67 postcode 6058 | 65 postcode 6076 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (83.5%).
Setting
| Forrestfield | Kalamunda | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 44 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 280 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 23.9 km 1.5 km to a named beach | 28.3 km |
NBN connectivity
| Forrestfield | Kalamunda | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 81/100 | 49/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Fibre to the node |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 57% 6,404 premises | 7% 3,630 premises |
Climate
| Forrestfield | Kalamunda | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 663 mm | 1,068 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | 32.3°C | 30.2°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.5°C | 7.9°C |
Council rates
| Forrestfield | Kalamunda | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,977/yr same for both | |
| Council | Kalamunda same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Forrestfield | Kalamunda | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Bullwinkel same for both | |
| Member | Trish Cook same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Forrestfield | Kalamunda | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $800,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Forrestfield
Kalamunda
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Forrestfield
Other comparisons with Kalamunda
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.