Forest Range vs Carey Gully
Forest Range is the younger of the two, with a median age of 38 against 53 in Carey Gully. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Forest Range, about half of households are couple families. In Carey Gully, most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Carey Gully: a median of $1.18 million, against $815,000 in Forest Range, though rent is higher in Forest Range. Carey Gully is closer to the city centre: 26.9 km, against 32 km. On these figures, Forest Range tends to suit families with children and buyers on a tighter budget, while Carey Gully suits people living alone and older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Carey Gully
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (6 vs 2)
- carries lower crime risk (26/100 vs 42/100)
- But Forest Range is already more of a family suburb (74% vs 63%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Forest Range
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- has cheaper houses ($815,407 vs $1,175,000)
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (22% vs 30%)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Carey Gully
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($300/wk vs $330/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Carey Gully
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (14/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (30 min vs 37 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (26.9 km vs 32 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Carey Gully
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (14/100 vs 0/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (27% vs 16%)
- carries lower crime risk (26/100 vs 42/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Forest Range
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (22.9% vs 3.4%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Forest Range and Carey Gully drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Carey Gully has more residents (428 vs 290); Carey Gully skews older (53 vs 38).
| Forest Range | Carey Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 290 | 428 +48% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +22.9% | +3.4% |
| Median age | 38 | 53 |
| Median household income | $108,628/yr +19% vs other | $88,348/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $330/wk +9% vs other | $300/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.9%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (6.3%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Forest Range | Carey Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $815,407 | $1,175,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
| Forest Range | Carey Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 93% | 99% |
| Environmental | 7% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Forest Range | Carey Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 95 across Adelaide Hills same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +53% same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Forest Range | Carey Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 18% of SA | Higher than 42% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 86% of SA | Higher than 67% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 49% of SA | Higher than 69% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 95% of SA | Higher than 69% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 95% of SA | Higher than 93% of SA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 67% of SA | Higher than 49% of SA |
Liveability
Carey Gully is more walkable (14 vs 0).
| Forest Range | Carey Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
Forest Range carries more crime risk (42 vs 26); Forest Range carries more bushfire risk (65 vs 45).
| Forest Range | Carey Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 65/100 | Moderate 45/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 42/100 | Low 26/100 |
| Flood | — same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Forest Range | Carey Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Forest Range | Carey Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 6 |
Mobility
Forest Range sits further from the CBD (32 km vs 26.9 km).
| Forest Range | Carey Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 14/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 32 km +16% vs other | 26.9 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 37 min | 30 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.1% postcode 5139 | 1.9% postcode 5144 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 98 postcode 5139 | 74 postcode 5144 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (79.7%).
Setting
| Forest Range | Carey Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 494 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 536 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 26.4 km | 23.5 km |
NBN connectivity
| Forest Range | Carey Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 29/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 109 premises | 0% 175 premises |
Climate
| Forest Range | Carey Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 921 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Forest Range | Carey Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | — | 6.0 µg/m³ |
| PM10 | — | 17.8 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | 0.51 pphm | 1.12 pphm |
Council rates
| Forest Range | Carey Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,727/yr same for both | |
| Council | Adelaide Hills same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Forest Range | Carey Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Mayo same for both | |
| Member | Rebekha Sharkie same for both | |
| Party | Centre Alliance same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Forest Range | Carey Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Forest Range
Carey Gully
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Forest Range
Other comparisons with Carey Gully
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.