Forcett vs Copping
Forcett is the younger of the two, with a median age of 39 against 45 in Copping. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Forcett: a median of $822,000, against $630,000 in Copping, and rent is higher there too. Forcett is closer to the city centre: 35.6 km, against 46 km. On these figures, Copping tends to suit buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Forcett
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more parks and reserves (9 vs 6)
Weighs schools, house stock, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Copping
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($630,000 vs $822,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Copping
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($225/wk vs $295/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Forcett
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (35.6 km vs 46 km)
- has a shorter drive in (38 min vs 44 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Copping
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more residents already 65 and over (20% vs 12%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, and walkability.
Investors
Forcett
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (14.3% vs 9.3%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Forcett and Copping drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Forcett has more residents (1,102 vs 200); Forcett has higher household incomes ($93,444 vs $60,424).
| Forcett | Copping | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,102 +82% vs other | 200 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +14.3% | +9.3% |
| Median age | 39 | 45 |
| Median household income | $93,444/yr +35% vs other | $60,424/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $295/wk +24% vs other | $225/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.5%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Forcett | Copping | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $822,000 | $630,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $495,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 26 days from 7 sales | — |
Zoning mix
Forcett has more rural and farming land (94% vs 84%).
| Forcett | Copping | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 94% | 84% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 1% | 16% |
| Environmental | 5% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Forcett | Copping | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 169 across Sorell same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +346% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Forcett | Copping | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 2.6% $450/wk on $916K | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within TAS
| Forcett | Copping | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 85% of TAS | Higher than 36% of TAS |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 49% of TAS | Higher than 30% of TAS |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 76% of TAS | — |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 73% of TAS | Higher than 59% of TAS |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 3% of TAS | — |
Liveability
| Forcett | Copping | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | — |
| Score | 42/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Forcett carries more bushfire risk (90 vs 75).
| Forcett | Copping | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 90/100 | High 75/100 |
| Crime | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | Moderate 49/100 | None 0/100 |
| Aircraft noise | Moderate 50/100 | None 0/100 |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Forcett | Copping | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Forcett | Copping | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 6 |
| Childcare | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 27 | 12 |
Mobility
Copping sits further from the CBD (46 km vs 35.6 km).
| Forcett | Copping | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Hobart | 35.6 km | 46 km +29% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 38 min | 44 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.9% postcode 7173 | 0.0% postcode 7174 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 33 postcode 7173 | — |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (82.2%).
Setting
| Forcett | Copping | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 144 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 72 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 5.0 km | 7.3 km |
NBN connectivity
| Forcett | Copping | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 39/100 | 30/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 410 premises | 0% 89 premises |
Climate
| Forcett | Copping | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 460 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 22.7°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 4.8°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Forcett | Copping | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,598/yr same for both | |
| Council | Sorell same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Forcett | Copping | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Lyons same for both | |
| Member | Rebecca White same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Forcett | Copping | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $20,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Forcett
Copping
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Forcett
Other comparisons with Copping
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.