Forbes vs Gunningbland
In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Forbes, about half of households are people living alone. In Gunningbland, the large majority of households are couple families. On these figures, Forbes tends to suit people living alone, while Gunningbland suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Forbes has more parks and reserves (36 vs 0)
- Gunningbland carries lower crime risk (37/100 vs 90/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Gunningbland
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper land ($45,000 vs $212,500)
Weighs land prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Gunningbland
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (9% vs 19%)
- has cheaper rent ($175/wk vs $230/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Forbes
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (18/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (310 min vs 320 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (385.4 km vs 392.2 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Forbes
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (18/100 vs 0/100)
- has more GPs (3 vs 0)
- But Gunningbland carries lower crime risk (37/100 vs 90/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Gunningbland
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (20.0% vs -3.3%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Forbes and Gunningbland drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Forbes has more residents (8,157 vs 90); Gunningbland has higher household incomes ($97,500 vs $63,492).
| Forbes | Gunningbland | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,157 +99% vs other | 90 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -3.3% | +20.0% |
| Median age | 42 | 44 |
| Median household income | $63,492/yr | $97,500/yr +54% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $230/wk +24% vs other | $175/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.8%).
Property market
| Forbes | Gunningbland | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $475,000 | — |
| Median unit price | $395,000 | — |
| Median land price | $212,500 | $45,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 62 days from 58 sales | — |
Zoning mix
| Forbes | Gunningbland | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 96% | 100% |
| Residential | 3% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Forbes | Gunningbland | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 31 across Forbes | 15 across Parkes |
| Approvals change year on year | +125% | -100% |
Gross rental yield
| Forbes | Gunningbland | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.9% $440/wk on $580K | — |
| Units | 4.0% $380/wk on $500K | — |
Ranking within NSW
| Forbes | Gunningbland | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 13% of NSW | — |
| Income | Higher than 26% of NSW | Higher than 65% of NSW |
| Schools | Higher than 47% of NSW | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 69% of NSW | Higher than 23% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 85% of NSW | — |
| EV adoption | Higher than 3% of NSW | Higher than 67% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 68% of NSW | Higher than 35% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 70% of NSW | — |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 22% of NSW | — |
Liveability
Forbes is more walkable (18 vs 0).
| Forbes | Gunningbland | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | D | — |
| Score | 29/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
Forbes carries more crime risk (90 vs 37).
| Forbes | Gunningbland | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 23/100 | Low 24/100 |
| Crime | High 90/100 | Low 37/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Forbes | Gunningbland | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 5 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 2 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 2 | 0 |
Schools in Forbes
- Red Bend Catholic College Independent · Secondary above peers
- Forbes Public School Government · Primary at peers
- St Laurence's Parish School Catholic · Primary at peers
- Forbes High School Government · Secondary below peers
- Forbes North Public School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Gunningbland
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Forbes | Gunningbland | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 2 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 8 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 36 | 0 |
| Childcare | 7 | 0 |
| GPs | 3 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 2 | 0 |
| Hospitals | 2 | 0 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 4 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 5 | 0 |
| Waterways | 36 | 8 |
Mobility
Gunningbland sits further from the CBD (392.2 km vs 385.4 km).
| Forbes | Gunningbland | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 18/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 385.4 km | 392.2 km +2% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 310 min | 320 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.1% postcode 2871 | 0.7% postcode 2876 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 48 postcode 2871 | 41 postcode 2876 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (79.4%).
Setting
| Forbes | Gunningbland | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 235 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 287 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Forbes | Gunningbland | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 55/100 | 25/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 24% 4,208 premises | 0% 28 premises |
Council rates
| Forbes | Gunningbland | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $957/yr | $1,146/yr |
| Council | Forbes | Parkes |
Federal electorate
| Forbes | Gunningbland | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Parkes same for both | |
| Member | Jamie Chaffey same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Forbes | Gunningbland | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Forbes
Gunningbland
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Forbes
Other comparisons with Gunningbland
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.