Forbes vs Gunning Gap
In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Forbes, about half of households are people living alone. In Gunning Gap, the large majority of households are couple families. On these figures, Forbes tends to suit people living alone, while Gunning Gap suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Forbes has more parks and reserves (36 vs 0)
- Gunning Gap carries lower crime risk (18/100 vs 90/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Gunning Gap
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (11% vs 19%)
- has cheaper rent ($150/wk vs $230/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Forbes
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (18/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (310 min vs 345 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (385.4 km vs 418.5 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Forbes
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (18/100 vs 0/100)
- has more GPs (3 vs 0)
- But Gunning Gap carries lower crime risk (18/100 vs 90/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Gunning Gap
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (14.3% vs -3.3%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Forbes and Gunning Gap drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Forbes has more residents (8,157 vs 88); Forbes rents higher ($230/wk vs $150/wk).
| Forbes | Gunning Gap | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,157 +99% vs other | 88 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -3.3% | +14.3% |
| Median age | 42 same for both | |
| Median household income | $63,492/yr | $68,224/yr +7% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $230/wk +35% vs other | $150/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.5%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.3%).
Property market
| Forbes | Gunning Gap | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $475,000 | — |
| Median unit price | $395,000 | — |
| Median land price | $212,500 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 62 days from 58 sales | — |
Zoning mix
| Forbes | Gunning Gap | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 96% | 99% |
| Residential | 3% | 0% |
| Environmental | 0% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Forbes | Gunning Gap | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 31 across Forbes same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +125% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Forbes | Gunning Gap | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.9% $440/wk on $580K | — |
| Units | 4.0% $380/wk on $500K | — |
Ranking within NSW
| Forbes | Gunning Gap | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 13% of NSW | — |
| Income | Higher than 26% of NSW | Higher than 31% of NSW |
| Schools | Higher than 47% of NSW | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 69% of NSW | Higher than 5% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 85% of NSW | — |
| EV adoption | Higher than 3% of NSW | Higher than 67% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 68% of NSW | Higher than 3% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 70% of NSW | — |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 22% of NSW | — |
Liveability
Forbes is more walkable (18 vs 0).
| Forbes | Gunning Gap | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | D | — |
| Score | 29/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
Forbes carries more crime risk (90 vs 18).
| Forbes | Gunning Gap | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 23/100 | Low 27/100 |
| Crime | High 90/100 | Low 18/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Forbes | Gunning Gap | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 5 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 2 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 2 | 0 |
Schools in Forbes
- Red Bend Catholic College Independent · Secondary above peers
- Forbes Public School Government · Primary at peers
- St Laurence's Parish School Catholic · Primary at peers
- Forbes High School Government · Secondary below peers
- Forbes North Public School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Gunning Gap
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Forbes | Gunning Gap | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 2 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 8 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 36 | 0 |
| Childcare | 7 | 0 |
| GPs | 3 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 2 | 0 |
| Hospitals | 2 | 0 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 4 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 5 | 0 |
| Waterways | 36 | 4 |
Mobility
Gunning Gap sits further from the CBD (418.5 km vs 385.4 km).
| Forbes | Gunning Gap | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 18/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 385.4 km | 418.5 km +9% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 310 min | 345 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.1% postcode 2871 | 0.7% postcode 2876 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 48 postcode 2871 | 41 postcode 2876 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (79.4%).
Setting
| Forbes | Gunning Gap | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 235 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 218 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Forbes | Gunning Gap | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 55/100 | 15/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Satellite (Sky Muster) |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 24% 4,208 premises | 0% 20 premises |
Council rates
| Forbes | Gunning Gap | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $957/yr same for both | |
| Council | Forbes same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Forbes | Gunning Gap | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Parkes same for both | |
| Member | Jamie Chaffey same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Forbes | Gunning Gap | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Forbes
Gunning Gap
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Forbes
Other comparisons with Gunning Gap
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.