Flinders Park vs Kidman Park
Flinders Park is the younger of the two, with a median age of 39 against 44 in Kidman Park. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Flinders Park, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Flinders Park: a median of $1.18 million, against $1.08 million in Kidman Park, and rent is higher there too. Flinders Park is closer to the city centre: 7.8 km, against 9.2 km.
Flinders Park and Kidman Park are closely matched suburbs with similar liveability scores of 70 and 72 respectively. The main practical difference is location: Flinders Park sits 7.8 km from the CBD compared to Kidman Park's 9.2 km, making it notably closer for commuters. Crime risk favours Kidman Park at 44 versus Flinders Park's 51, so the choice largely depends on whether proximity to the city centre or a lower crime environment matters more to you. Both suburbs have zero bushfire and flood risk.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Flinders Park has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
- Kidman Park has more parks and reserves (9 vs 4)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Flinders Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper land ($560,000 vs $740,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Kidman Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (77/100 vs 67/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Kidman Park
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more residents already 65 and over (24% vs 17%)
- is more walkable (77/100 vs 67/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Flinders Park and Kidman Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Flinders Park has more residents (5,489 vs 3,874); Kidman Park skews older (44 vs 39).
| Flinders Park | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,489 +29% vs other | 3,874 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +12.5% | +14.6% |
| Median age | 39 | 44 |
| Median household income | $91,208/yr +7% vs other | $85,124/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $380/wk +6% vs other | $358/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (14.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.6%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Flinders Park | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,177,000 | $1,080,000 |
| Median unit price | $710,000 | — |
| Median land price | $560,000 | $740,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 19 days from 67 sales | 20 days from 28 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
82 vs 24 sales
45 vs 17 sales
Zoning mix
| Flinders Park | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 85% | 86% |
| Commercial | 5% | 10% |
| Parks and recreation | 8% | 5% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 2% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Flinders Park | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,636 across Charles Sturt same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +109% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Flinders Park | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.0% $750/wk on $1.3M | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Flinders Park | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 63% of SA | Higher than 60% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 70% of SA | Higher than 63% of SA |
| Schools | Higher than 83% of SA | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 87% of SA | Higher than 91% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 46% of SA | Higher than 41% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 73% of SA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 92% of SA | Higher than 91% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 15% of SA | — |
Liveability
Kidman Park is more walkable (77 vs 67).
| Flinders Park | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 61/100 | 62/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
| Flinders Park | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 59/100 | Moderate 58/100 |
| Flood | High 75/100 | Moderate 67/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 10 within 5 km | 7 within 5 km |
Schools
| Flinders Park | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 3 | 2 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Adelaide University, Adelaide City Campus, 5.7 km | 3 Adelaide University, Adelaide City Campus, 7.0 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.8% | 2.3% |
Schools in Flinders Park
- Flinders Park Primary School Government · Primary above peers
- Nazareth Catholic College - Flinders Park Campus Catholic · Secondary below peers
- Our Lady of La Vang School Catholic · Combined · Special school
Schools in Kidman Park
- Kidman Park Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Nazareth Catholic College - Kidman Park Campus Catholic · Secondary
Amenities in the suburb
| Flinders Park | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 9 |
| Childcare | 3 | 4 |
| GPs | 2 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 1 same for both | |
Mobility
| Flinders Park | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 67/100 | 77/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 7.8 km | 9.2 km +18% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 14 min | 16 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 105.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 65.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.9% postcode 5025 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 56 postcode 5025 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (75.7%).
Setting
| Flinders Park | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 13 m above sea level, at the suburb centre same for both | |
| Distance to the ocean | 4.7 km 4.7 km to a named beach | 3.2 km 3.3 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Flinders Park | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 79/100 | 77/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 15% 2,449 premises | 8% 1,781 premises |
Climate
| Flinders Park | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 457 mm | 394 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.1°C | 28.1°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.5°C | 7.8°C |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Flinders Park | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 1.12 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Flinders Park | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,726/yr same for both | |
| Council | Charles Sturt same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Flinders Park | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Hindmarsh same for both | |
| Member | Mark Butler same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Flinders Park | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Flinders Park
Other comparisons with Kidman Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.