Fletcher vs Lenaghan
Fletcher is the younger of the two, with a median age of 32 against 43 in Lenaghan. In both, most households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. On these figures, Fletcher tends to suit families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Fletcher
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (6 vs 0)
- has more childcare (5 vs 0)
- has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
- But Lenaghan carries lower crime risk (16/100 vs 47/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Lenaghan
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (13% vs 20%)
- has cheaper rent ($400/wk vs $510/wk)
- But Fletcher has a bigger rental market to choose from (28% vs 17%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Fletcher
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (72/100 vs 14/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Fletcher is more walkable (72/100 vs 14/100)
- Lenaghan carries lower crime risk (16/100 vs 47/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Fletcher
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (56.0% vs 18.6%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Fletcher and Lenaghan drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Fletcher has more residents (8,014 vs 70); Lenaghan skews older (43 vs 32).
| Fletcher | Lenaghan | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,014 +99% vs other | 70 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +56.0% | +18.6% |
| Median age | 32 | 43 |
| Median household income | $132,340/yr | $159,224/yr +20% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $510/wk +22% vs other | $400/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (28.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (30.0%).
Property market
| Fletcher | Lenaghan | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,030,000 | — |
| Median unit price | $675,000 | — |
| Median land price | $741,500 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 22 days from 106 sales | — |
Zoning mix
Lenaghan has more land zoned for conservation (95% vs 42%).
| Fletcher | Lenaghan | |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | 42% | 95% |
| Residential | 52% | 0% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 0% | 5% |
| Parks and recreation | 5% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Fletcher | Lenaghan | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 912 across Newcastle same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +77% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Fletcher | Lenaghan | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.1% $800/wk on $1.01M | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Fletcher | Lenaghan | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 49% of NSW | — |
| Income | Higher than 89% of NSW | Higher than 96% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 89% of NSW | Higher than 65% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 83% of NSW | — |
| EV adoption | Higher than 76% of NSW | Higher than 68% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 94% of NSW | Higher than 61% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 78% of NSW | — |
Liveability
Fletcher is more walkable (72 vs 14).
| Fletcher | Lenaghan | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | — |
| Score | 56/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
Fletcher carries more bushfire risk (57 vs 0); Fletcher carries more crime risk (47 vs 16).
| Fletcher | Lenaghan | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 57/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 47/100 | Low 16/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Fletcher | Lenaghan | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 The University of Newcastle (Callaghan), 6.3 km | 1 The University of Newcastle (Callaghan), 8.3 km |
Schools in Fletcher
- Bishop Tyrrell Anglican College Independent · Combined above peers
Schools in Lenaghan
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Fletcher | Lenaghan | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 2 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 0 |
| Childcare | 5 | 0 |
| GPs | 2 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 3 | 0 |
Mobility
| Fletcher | Lenaghan | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 72/100 | 14/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 148.7 km | 149.2 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 110 min | 109 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.9% postcode 2287 | 0.7% postcode 2322 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 42 postcode 2287 | 64 postcode 2322 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (69.4%).
Setting
| Fletcher | Lenaghan | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 32 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | -1 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 11.3 km | 12.9 km |
NBN connectivity
| Fletcher | Lenaghan | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 88/100 | 30/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 79% 2,830 premises | 0% 22 premises |
Climate
| Fletcher | Lenaghan | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,025 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 25.4°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 10.2°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Fletcher | Lenaghan | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.1 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 16.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.53 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Fletcher | Lenaghan | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,783/yr same for both | |
| Council | Newcastle same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Fletcher | Lenaghan | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Newcastle | Paterson |
| Member | Sharon Claydon | Meryl Swanson |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Fletcher | Lenaghan | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Fletcher
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Fletcher
Other comparisons with Lenaghan
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.