Fishing Point vs Rathmines
Rathmines is the younger of the two, with a median age of 47 against 51 in Fishing Point. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Fishing Point, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Fishing Point: a median of $1.2 million, against $849,000 in Rathmines, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Fishing Point tends to suit people living alone, while Rathmines suits buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Fishing Point
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (25/100 vs 49/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Rathmines
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($848,750 vs $1,195,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Fishing Point
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (45/100 vs 33/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Fishing Point
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (25/100 vs 49/100)
- is more walkable (45/100 vs 33/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (33% vs 25%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Fishing Point and Rathmines drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Rathmines has more residents (2,076 vs 1,105); Fishing Point has higher household incomes ($91,260 vs $78,884).
| Fishing Point | Rathmines | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,105 | 2,076 +88% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +6.4% | +9.0% |
| Median age | 51 | 47 |
| Median household income | $91,260/yr +14% vs other | $78,884/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $430/wk +7% vs other | $400/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.9%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Fishing Point | Rathmines | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,195,000 | $848,750 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $1,150,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 24 days from 22 sales | 24 days from 14 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
21 vs 18 sales
19 vs 9 sales
Zoning mix
Rathmines has more land zoned for conservation (19% vs 1%).
| Fishing Point | Rathmines | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 92% | 24% |
| Parks and recreation | 7% | 30% |
| Environmental | 1% | 19% |
| Rural and farming | 0% | 10% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 0% | 9% |
| Industrial | 0% | 8% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Fishing Point | Rathmines | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,212 across Lake Macquarie same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +2% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Fishing Point | Rathmines | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 4.9% $790/wk on $840K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Fishing Point | Rathmines | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 58% of NSW | Higher than 40% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 59% of NSW | Higher than 46% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 80% of NSW | Higher than 76% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 49% of NSW | Higher than 57% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 61% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 78% of NSW | Higher than 91% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 96% of NSW |
Liveability
Fishing Point scores higher overall (67 vs 31); Fishing Point is more walkable (45 vs 33).
| Fishing Point | Rathmines | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | C |
| Score | 67/100 | 31/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 |
Risk profile
Rathmines carries more bushfire risk (83 vs 0); Rathmines carries more crime risk (49 vs 25).
| Fishing Point | Rathmines | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | High 83/100 |
| Crime | Low 25/100 | Moderate 49/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 3 within 5 km |
Schools
| Fishing Point | Rathmines | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Fishing Point
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Rathmines
- Rathmines Public School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Fishing Point | Rathmines | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 2 |
| Childcare | 0 | 2 |
| GPs | 0 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
| Fishing Point | Rathmines | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 45/100 | 33/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 129.7 km | 128.9 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 104 min | 101 min |
| Public transport score | 35/100 Bus | 58/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 9.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 21.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 2283 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 48 postcode 2283 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (71.9%).
Setting
| Fishing Point | Rathmines | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 32 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 27 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 5.6 km | 7.7 km |
NBN connectivity
| Fishing Point | Rathmines | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 72/100 | 83/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 40% 521 premises | 54% 982 premises |
Climate
| Fishing Point | Rathmines | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,025 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 25.4°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 10.2°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Fishing Point | Rathmines | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 11.6 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.27 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Fishing Point | Rathmines | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,708/yr same for both | |
| Council | Lake Macquarie same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Fishing Point | Rathmines | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Hunter same for both | |
| Member | Dan Repacholi same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Fishing Point | Rathmines | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Fishing Point
Rathmines
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Fishing Point
Other comparisons with Rathmines
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.