Fisher vs Paisley
Paisley is the younger of the two, with a median age of 48 against 59 in Fisher. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are people living alone. On these figures, Paisley tends to suit families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Fisher
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (7 vs 0)
- carries lower crime risk (51/100 vs 75/100)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (100% vs 83%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Fisher
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (26% vs 41%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Fisher
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- has cheaper rent ($100/wk vs $330/wk)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (17% vs 31%)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Fisher
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (109 min vs 120 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (144.2 km vs 153.9 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Fisher
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (51/100 vs 75/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Fisher and Paisley drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Paisley rents higher ($330/wk vs $100/wk); Paisley has higher household incomes ($55,224 vs $29,900).
| Fisher | Paisley | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 61 | 96 +57% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +13.0% | +14.3% |
| Median age | 59 | 48 |
| Median household income | $29,900/yr | $55,224/yr +85% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $100/wk | $330/wk +230% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (32.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (26.2%).
Property market
| Fisher | Paisley | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $245,000 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 59 days from 4 sales | — |
Zoning mix
| Fisher | Paisley | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 94% | 97% |
| Environmental | 6% | 3% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Fisher | Paisley | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 131 across Mid Murray | 46 across Loxton Waikerie |
| Approvals change year on year | -42% | -30% |
Ranking within SA
| Fisher | Paisley | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 2% of SA | Higher than 20% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 40% of SA | Higher than 21% of SA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 56% of SA | — |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 40% of SA | Higher than 57% of SA |
Liveability
| Fisher | Paisley | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | high-need area decile 1/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 |
Risk profile
Paisley carries more crime risk (75 vs 51).
| Fisher | Paisley | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 51/100 | High 75/100 |
| Flood | — same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 3 within 5 km |
Schools
| Fisher | Paisley | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Fisher | Paisley | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 7 | 0 |
| Waterways | 2 | 0 |
Mobility
Paisley sits further from the CBD (153.9 km vs 144.2 km).
| Fisher | Paisley | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Adelaide | 144.2 km | 153.9 km +7% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 109 min | 120 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 5354 | 0.0% postcode 5357 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 50 postcode 5354 | 52 postcode 5357 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (68.8%).
Setting
| Fisher | Paisley | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 87 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 29 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Fisher | Paisley | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 27/100 | 30/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 43 premises | 0% 59 premises |
Council rates
| Fisher | Paisley | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,037/yr | $1,871/yr |
| Council | Mid Murray | Loxton Waikerie |
Federal electorate
| Fisher | Paisley | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Barker same for both | |
| Member | Tony Pasin same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Fisher | Paisley | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Fisher
Other comparisons with Paisley
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.