Fisher vs Healy
Healy is the younger of the two, with a median age of 33 against 55 in Fisher. In both, most households own their home. In Fisher, the large majority of homes are flats or apartments and the large majority of households are people living alone. In Healy, the large majority of homes are detached houses and most households are couple families. On these figures, Fisher tends to suit people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Healy
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more separate houses rather than flats (97% vs 12%)
- has more schools inside the suburb (2 vs 0)
- carries lower crime risk (86/100 vs 97/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, and childcare.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Fisher
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($163/wk vs $380/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Healy
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (33/100 vs 4/100)
- has a shorter drive in (1212 min vs 1231 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (1827.3 km vs 1833 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Fisher has more units and townhouses to downsize into (88% vs 3%)
- Healy is more walkable (33/100 vs 4/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Fisher
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (1525.0% vs -2.9%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Fisher and Healy drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Healy has more residents (1,824 vs 65); Healy rents higher ($380/wk vs $163/wk).
| Fisher | Healy | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 65 | 1,824 +2706% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +1525.0% | -2.9% |
| Median age | 55 | 33 |
| Median household income | $84,500/yr | $157,248/yr +86% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $163/wk | $380/wk +133% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (33.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (6.2%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (26.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Fisher | Healy | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $390,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Fisher | Healy | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 56% of QLD | Higher than 97% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 67% of QLD | Higher than 83% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 1% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 69% of QLD | Higher than 73% of QLD |
Liveability
Healy is more walkable (33 vs 4).
| Fisher | Healy | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | C |
| Score | — | 45/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 | advantaged area decile 8/10 |
Risk profile
Fisher carries more bushfire risk (77 vs 0); Fisher carries more crime risk (97 vs 86).
| Fisher | Healy | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 77/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | High 97/100 | High 86/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 9 within 5 km |
Schools
| Fisher | Healy | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 2 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Fisher
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Healy
- Healy State School Government · Primary at peers
- Queensland Pathways State College - Mount Isa Campus Government · Secondary
Amenities in the suburb
| Fisher | Healy | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
Fisher sits further from the CBD (1833 km vs 1827.3 km).
| Fisher | Healy | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 4/100 | 33/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 1833 km | 1827.3 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 1231 min | 1212 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.1% postcode 4825 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 38 postcode 4825 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (87.6%).
Setting
| Fisher | Healy | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 385 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 360 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Fisher | Healy | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 48/100 | 62/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 6% 33 premises | 30% 698 premises |
Climate
| Fisher | Healy | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 502 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Fisher | Healy | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Fisher | Healy | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $893/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mount Isa same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Fisher | Healy | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Kennedy same for both | |
| Member | Bob Katter same for both | |
| Party | Katter's Australian Party (KAP) same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Fisher | Healy | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Healy
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Fisher
Other comparisons with Healy
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.