Findon vs Kidman Park
Findon is the younger of the two, with a median age of 37 against 44 in Kidman Park. In both, most households own their home and most homes are detached houses. Houses cost more in Kidman Park: a median of $1.08 million, against $980,000 in Findon, and rent is higher there too.
Findon is the larger and more walkable suburb, with a population of 6997 and a walkability score of 87 compared to Kidman Park's 3874 and 77. However, Kidman Park residents earn notably more—a median household income of $85124 versus $74048—and the suburb scores higher on liveability (62 versus 41) and socio-economic measures. Kidman Park also has lower crime and flood risk ratings. Findon offers slightly closer CBD proximity at 8.9 km, while house prices are lower at $980000 compared to $1080000 in Kidman Park. The choice depends on whether you prioritise walkability and urban convenience or a quieter, more affluent neighbourhood with lower risk profiles.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Kidman Park
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (58/100 vs 81/100)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (81% vs 66%)
- is already more of a family suburb (59% vs 50%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Findon has cheaper houses ($980,000 vs $1,080,000)
- Kidman Park has cheaper land ($740,000 vs $882,500)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Findon
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (37% vs 24%)
- has cheaper rent ($310/wk vs $358/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Findon
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (87/100 vs 77/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Findon has more units and townhouses to downsize into (34% vs 19%)
- Kidman Park carries lower crime risk (58/100 vs 81/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Findon and Kidman Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Findon has more residents (6,997 vs 3,874); Kidman Park skews older (44 vs 37).
| Findon | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,997 +45% vs other | 3,874 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +12.8% | +14.6% |
| Median age | 37 | 44 |
| Median household income | $74,048/yr | $85,124/yr +15% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $310/wk | $358/wk +15% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.0%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.9%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Findon | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $980,000 | $1,080,000 |
| Median unit price | $586,000 | — |
| Median land price | $882,500 | $740,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 18 days from 106 sales | 20 days from 28 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
88 vs 24 sales
37 vs 17 sales
Zoning mix
| Findon | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 89% | 86% |
| Commercial | 10% same for both | |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 5% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Findon | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,636 across Charles Sturt same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +109% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Findon | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.9% $700/wk on $935K | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Findon | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 41% of SA | Higher than 60% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 48% of SA | Higher than 63% of SA |
| Schools | Higher than 29% of SA | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 97% of SA | Higher than 91% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 48% of SA | Higher than 41% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 59% of SA | Higher than 73% of SA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 91% of SA same for both | |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 48% of SA | — |
Liveability
Kidman Park scores higher overall (62 vs 41); Findon is more walkable (87 vs 77).
| Findon | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | B |
| Score | 41/100 | 62/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
Findon carries more crime risk (81 vs 58); Findon carries more flood risk (78 vs 67).
| Findon | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | High 81/100 | Moderate 58/100 |
| Flood | High 78/100 | Moderate 67/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 10 within 5 km | 7 within 5 km |
Schools
| Findon | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 3 | 2 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Adelaide University, Adelaide City Campus, 7.1 km | 3 Adelaide University, Adelaide City Campus, 7.0 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.8% | 2.3% |
Schools in Findon
- Findon High School Government · Secondary below peers
- Findon High School - Findon Technical College Government · Secondary
- Nazareth Catholic College - Findon Campus Catholic · Primary
Schools in Kidman Park
- Kidman Park Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Nazareth Catholic College - Kidman Park Campus Catholic · Secondary
Amenities in the suburb
| Findon | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 4 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 3 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 9 same for both | |
| Childcare | 3 | 4 |
| GPs | 0 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 3 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 2 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
| Findon | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 87/100 | 77/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 8.9 km | 9.2 km +3% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 16 min same for both | |
| Public transport score | 78/100 Bus | 79/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 139.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 65.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 5023 | 0.9% postcode 5025 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 44 postcode 5023 | 56 postcode 5025 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (75.7%).
Setting
| Findon | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 13 m above sea level, at the suburb centre same for both | |
| Distance to the ocean | 4.0 km 4.0 km to a named beach | 3.2 km 3.3 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Findon | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 77/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Hybrid fibre-coaxial |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 47% 3,976 premises | 8% 1,781 premises |
Climate
| Findon | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 457 mm | 394 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.1°C | 28.1°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.5°C | 7.8°C |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Findon | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 1.12 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Findon | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,726/yr same for both | |
| Council | Charles Sturt same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Findon | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Hindmarsh same for both | |
| Member | Mark Butler same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Findon | Kidman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Findon
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Findon
Other comparisons with Kidman Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.