Figtree vs Mount Kembla
In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. On these figures, Mount Kembla tends to suit couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Figtree has more childcare (6 vs 1)
- Mount Kembla carries lower crime risk (27/100 vs 43/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Figtree has a bigger rental market to choose from (18% vs 7%)
- Mount Kembla leaves renters under less rental stress (16% vs 21%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Figtree
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (48/100 vs 40/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (87.8 km vs 90.5 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Figtree
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (18% vs 2%)
- has more GPs (3 vs 0)
- is more walkable (48/100 vs 40/100)
- But Mount Kembla carries lower crime risk (27/100 vs 43/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Figtree
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (6.7% vs 1.4%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Figtree and Mount Kembla drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Figtree has more residents (12,335 vs 1,083); Mount Kembla has higher household incomes ($146,848 vs $106,184).
| Figtree | Mount Kembla | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,335 +91% vs other | 1,083 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +6.7% | +1.4% |
| Median age | 40 | 42 |
| Median household income | $106,184/yr | $146,848/yr +38% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $430/wk | $440/wk +2% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.1%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Figtree | Mount Kembla | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,180,000 | $1,217,500 |
| Median unit price | $630,000 | — |
| Median land price | $1,300,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 24 days from 116 sales | 26 days from 7 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
83 vs 9 sales
89 vs 7 sales
Zoning mix
Mount Kembla has more land zoned for conservation (82% vs 28%).
| Figtree | Mount Kembla | |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | 28% | 82% |
| Residential | 50% | 0% |
| Rural and farming | 7% | 14% |
| Parks and recreation | 10% | 2% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 4% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Figtree | Mount Kembla | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,476 across Wollongong same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -31% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Figtree | Mount Kembla | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.5% $800/wk on $1.19M | — |
| Units | 4.7% $470/wk on $519K | — |
Ranking within NSW
| Figtree | Mount Kembla | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 59% of NSW | Higher than 65% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 72% of NSW | Higher than 94% of NSW |
| Schools | Higher than 51% of NSW | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 81% of NSW | Higher than 78% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 59% of NSW | Higher than 76% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 91% of NSW | Higher than 82% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 81% of NSW | Higher than 89% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 45% of NSW | — |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 53% of NSW | — |
Liveability
Figtree is more walkable (48 vs 40).
| Figtree | Mount Kembla | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 51/100 | 55/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
Figtree carries more crime risk (43 vs 27).
| Figtree | Mount Kembla | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 64/100 | Moderate 68/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 43/100 | Low 27/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 12 within 5 km | 9 within 5 km |
Schools
| Figtree | Mount Kembla | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 4 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 2 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 1 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 UOW Wollongong, 4.1 km | 1 UOW Wollongong, 6.5 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 3.0% | 2.1% |
Schools in Figtree
- Figtree Public School Government · Primary above peers
- Figtree High School Government · Secondary at peers
- Nareena Hills Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Figtree Heights Public School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Mount Kembla
- Mount Kembla Public School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Figtree | Mount Kembla | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 2 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 6 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 1 |
| Childcare | 6 | 1 |
| GPs | 3 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 2 | 0 |
| Hospitals | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 5 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
| EV chargers | 2 | 0 |
| Waterways | 14 | 5 |
Mobility
Mount Kembla sits further from the CBD (90.5 km vs 87.8 km).
| Figtree | Mount Kembla | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 48/100 | 40/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 87.8 km | 90.5 km +3% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 83 min | 87 min |
| Public transport score | 77/100 Bus | 38/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 220.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 10.5 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.6% postcode 2525 | 1.1% postcode 2526 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 41 postcode 2525 | 47 postcode 2526 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (58.8%).
Setting
| Figtree | Mount Kembla | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 68 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 78 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 4.6 km 4.9 km to a named beach | 6.8 km |
NBN connectivity
| Figtree | Mount Kembla | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 74/100 | 80/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 52% 5,004 premises | 64% 375 premises |
Climate
| Figtree | Mount Kembla | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 974 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Figtree | Mount Kembla | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.2 µg/m³ | 5.9 µg/m³ |
| PM10 | 18.2 µg/m³ | 19.8 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | 0.66 pphm | 0.45 pphm |
Council rates
| Figtree | Mount Kembla | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,751/yr same for both | |
| Council | Wollongong same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Figtree | Mount Kembla | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Cunningham same for both | |
| Member | Alison Byrnes same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Figtree | Mount Kembla | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Figtree
Mount Kembla
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Figtree
Other comparisons with Mount Kembla
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.